Predicting spin rate of satellites

The Forces of Nature by Kelland Terry, Ph.D.

Spinning bodies plowing through a dense field of gravitons suggests that gravity, satellite diameter, and satellite momentum can be used to predict spin rate. The question posed is this: Can these three independent variables predict the spin rates for the satellites in our solar system? This was analyzed using regression analysis for our Sun and all the moons and planets in our solar system. There were 26 heavenly bodies used in this analysis.

Now for the results: A regression analysis computes an r value, which is a measurement of goodness of fit for the satellites along a regression line. The closer the r value is to 1.0 the better the fit. In this study r was 0.99, which is pretty close to 1.0. This suggests that 99 percent of the spin rate for of all the spinning bodies in our solar system can be accounted for by their momentum, diameter, and the gravitational force between satellite and central body. For example, the Sun spins on its axis at 1946 meters/second and the predicted rate was also 1946 meters per second. Mars spin rate is 240.8 m/s and its predicted rate was 243 m/s. Saturn’s actual spin rate is 10279 m/s and the predicted value was 10061 m/s.

A little discussion might help. The theory is that the spin of a satellite moving through a dense fabric of elastic strings is influenced in much the same way as a billiard ball striking the side of a pool table. When the ball strikes the cushion, it will promote a spin inward towards the side of the table. In the case of Earth, striking the gravitons emanating from the Sun, it will tend to cause the planet to spin inward toward the Sun. Thus, it will induce the planet to spin in the same direction it orbits the Sun.

Now for the conclusion: The study is as predicted: Satellite spin is controlled by the density of the elastic strings and gravity, diameter of the satellite because this affects its interaction with the graviton matrix, and satellite momentum because a large fast body such as our Sun will be less affected by the graviton matrix it must plow through as it circles the center of the Milky Way Galaxy.

Why is this important? It provides striking evidence that elastic strings have a physical presence in space, which means gravitons must have mass. How else can you explain the results of this experiment? It also is of interest because it explains one of the conundrums of science—what controls the spin rate of satellites.

This study is supported by the following: I have shown that spinning table tennis balls in flight continue to curve even in a complete vacuum, which suggests they are spinning against a graviton matrix in their path. It means gravitons have a physical presence in space; they have mass. This concept is supported by my experiments that show spinning table tennis balls curve more in a magnetic field because, like gravitons, the elastic strings that make up the magnetic field have mass. Kelland—www.vestheory.com