Predicting spin rate of satellites

The Forces of Nature by Kelland Terry, Ph.D.

Spinning bodies plowing through a dense field of gravitons suggests that gravity, satellite diameter, and satellite momentum can be used to predict spin rate. The question posed is this: Can these three independent variables predict the spin rates for the satellites in our solar system? This was analyzed using regression analysis for our Sun and all the moons and planets in our solar system. There were 26 heavenly bodies used in this analysis.

Now for the results: A regression analysis computes an r value, which is a measurement of goodness of fit for the satellites along a regression line. The closer the r value is to 1.0 the better the fit. In this study r was 0.99, which is pretty close to 1.0. This suggests that 99 percent of the spin rate for of all the spinning bodies in our solar system can be accounted for by their momentum, diameter, and the gravitational force between satellite and central body. For example, the Sun spins on its axis at 1946 meters/second and the predicted rate was also 1946 meters per second. Mars spin rate is 240.8 m/s and its predicted rate was 243 m/s. Saturn’s actual spin rate is 10279 m/s and the predicted value was 10061 m/s.

A little discussion might help. The theory is that the spin of a satellite moving through a dense fabric of elastic strings is influenced in much the same way as a billiard ball striking the side of a pool table. When the ball strikes the cushion, it will promote a spin inward towards the side of the table. In the case of Earth, striking the gravitons emanating from the Sun, it will tend to cause the planet to spin inward toward the Sun. Thus, it will induce the planet to spin in the same direction it orbits the Sun.

Now for the conclusion: The study is as predicted: Satellite spin is controlled by the density of the elastic strings and gravity, diameter of the satellite because this affects its interaction with the graviton matrix, and satellite momentum because a large fast body such as our Sun will be less affected by the graviton matrix it must plow through as it circles the center of the Milky Way Galaxy.

Why is this important? It provides striking evidence that elastic strings have a physical presence in space, which means gravitons must have mass. How else can you explain the results of this experiment? It also is of interest because it explains one of the conundrums of science—what controls the spin rate of satellites.

This study is supported by the following: I have shown that spinning table tennis balls in flight continue to curve even in a complete vacuum, which suggests they are spinning against a graviton matrix in their path. It means gravitons have a physical presence in space; they have mass. This concept is supported by my experiments that show spinning table tennis balls curve more in a magnetic field because, like gravitons, the elastic strings that make up the magnetic field have mass. Kelland—www.vestheory.com

Factors that influence spin rate of satellites

The Forces of Nature by Kelland Terry, Ph.D.

The diameter of the satellite will influence spin rate because the larger the diameter the greater the surface of the satellite that comes in contact with the graviton matrix. In this case, it is having a positive effect on satellite spin.

However, like gravity, the diameter of the satellite can also have a negative impact on spin rate. The larger the diameter, the greater the leverage that Earth can apply to our Moon to control spin rate. It is much like the use of a long pole to maintain balance by someone walking along a tight wire. Earth’s gravity is pulling down on both sides of the moon, which tends to reduce spin rate.

Momentum also plays a part in the spin rate of a satellite. Momentum is a measurement of mass x velocity. We all know it takes a country mile to stop a train because of its great momentum. In the same manner, our massive Sun moving at great velocity will be affected less by the graviton matrix it plows through as it rotates around the center of the Milky Way Galaxy. Its huge momentum will tend to push aside the matrix, which means its spin will be influenced less by its rotation velocity. Thus, a large momentum is a negative factor influencing spin rate.

The extent that gravity, satellite diameter, and satellite momentum influence spin rate can be measured. This is discussed in my next blog. This is all based on the idea that gravitons form a dense, physical matrix in space that spinning bodies plow through as they orbit some central body. Kelland—www.vestheory.com

Spin rate of solar bodies

The Forces of Nature by Kelland Terry, Ph.D.

Astrophysicists believe our solar system was formed from a swirling mass of hydrogen, silicon, and other particles that coalesced to form the Sun, planets, and moons found in our solar system.

The energy of the swirling particles was conserved as orbiting, spinning bodies in our solar system. Scientists believe at one time the spin rate of the Sun was 1000 times greater than what it is today. The spin rate for the individual planets varies greatly from Mercury with a spin rate of just 3 meters per second to Jupiter that spins at 13,070 meters per second. Planet Earth spins just once in 24 hours, which means its surface speed is 248 meters per second. All of the moons trapped in orbit about their respective planets spin very slowly. What dictates the spin rate of these bodies? What causes the great differences in their spin rate? Why has the spin rate of the Sun slowed down? Elastic strings do have a story to tell. Kelland—www.vestheory.com