The Forces of Nature by Kelland Terry, Ph.D.
The following is a brief summary of some of the articles on ether theory and relativity, which I offer for your consideration.
P. Cornille (1996) published a paper in the Hadronic Journal (19, p215) entitled: “Does the ether exist?” He sums up his views as follows: “In this paper we review several experiments, including the Michelson-Morley experiment, in order to show that contrary to the usual textbook presentation of special relativity all these experiments are consistent with the existence of randomly fluctuating stationary ether.” VES theory fulfills this condition. Our galaxy is filled with a vast number of gravitons traveling more or less at random in all directions.
F. Goy (1996), in Foundations of Physics Letters (9, p165), stated: “In the last two decades, theories explaining the same experiments as well as special relativity does, were developed by using different synchronization procedures. All of them are ether-like theories. Most authors believe these theories to be equivalent to special relativity”.
H.P. Dart (1971) in Spectroscopy Letters (4, p29) had this to say about the various theories concerning light. “The ether-wave theory of light, suitably modified, is fully supported by all known evidence. Further observation and analysis will be required to determine which of its several forms accurately represents reality. On the other hand….the special theory of relativity is not supported by the evidence.”
F. Selleri (1994) in Frontiers of Fundamental Physics, Proceedings of an international Conference, (Sept. p181) summed up the situation this way: “In particular it will be shown that any modification of the coefficients of the Lorentz transformations, however small, gives rise to an ether theory…”. VES theory needs no modification of the Lorentz equation.
D. McCarthy (1993) in Galilean Electrodynamics (8, p116) pointed out the inconsistency between quantum electrodynamics and special relativity.
F. Winterberg (1988) in Zeitschrift fur Naturforschung (43A, 369) proposed “…ether is the cause of all relativistic effects, and for this reason is assumed to obey a non-relativistic equation of motion…” As we shall see, VES ether theory does obey a form of relativity but in a 3-dimensional world.
G. Spavieri (1988) in Foundation of Physics Letters (1, p387) pointed out “The origin of the equilibrium paradoxes of special relativity is analyzed.” “…inconsistency justifies the search for alternative theories such as the modern ether theories.”
N. Cherepkov (1980) in the Journal of Physics B (Atomic and Molecular Physics) (13, L 687) discusses spin polarization of photoelectrons ejected from outer subshells. He stated that “…in most cases the non-relativistic theory is capable of describing the polarization phenomena.”
R. Nedved, B.S. (1992) in Physics Essays (5, p153) stated: “The relativistic answer is insufficient because of the inconsistency between the Doppler relations and the LT relations.” LT is a reference to the Lorentz transformation.
B. Neganov (1991) in an article in the Hadronic Journal (14, p377) entitled “On the principle of relativity and its violation in the case of a spin precession of moving charge articles,” states: “It is found that in the case of a spin precession of particles moving along a curvilinear trajectory, the principle of relativity is violated up to the first order over the parameter v/c.”
R. Santilli (1996) in the Hadronic Journal (19, p41) pointed out that “The inapplicability of both the special and general relativities for interior dynamical problems is beyond credible doubts because of a truly impressive amount of physical evidence, such as: the impossibility of representing locally varying speeds of light, the inability to treat highly nonlinear, nonlocal and nonalgrangian systems, the transparent impossibility of representing interior orbits with continuously decaying angular momentum, gross inconsistencies occurring even in simple physical media…”.
H. Hayden (1995) in Physics Essays (8, p366) stated: “There is abundant evidence to show that SRT (special relativity theory) must, at the very least, engage in tortuous reasoning to explain some experimental results, among them stellar aberration (which in SRT depends upon relative velocity of Earth and star); the Sagnac and Michelson-Gale experiments; the Allen around-the-world Sagnac experiment; the Hafele-Keating experiment; the Brillet-Hall experiment; and the Champeney-Moon experiment.”
Stellar aberration of light occurs when two observers in motion on the Earth see a distant star from two different locations with respect to the line of motion. It was first described by Bradley in 1729 and is the oldest proof that Earth rotates around the Sun.
C. Whitney at Tufts University, (1994) pointed out in Galilean Electrodynamics (5, p98) that “Stellar aberration has been the subject of recent critiques of special relativity theory because of its apparent inconsistency with Doppler shifts. Careful analysis can remove this conflict. But the analysis requires unwelcome recourse to an unwanted coordinate frame reminiscent of absolute space. So even if reconciled with Doppler shifts, stellar aberration remains an embarrassment to special relativity theory.”
P. Naur (1999) in Physics Essays (12, p358) explained that prior to Einstein’s special theory of relativity, stellar aberration was explained by “waves in the ether.”
O. Jefimenko (1998) in Z. Naturforsch (53A, p977) had this to say: “The calculations presented in this paper show that some of the experiments allegedly proving the reality of length contraction and time dilation can be unambiguously interpreted as manifestations of velocity-dependent dynamical interactions taking place within the systems involved in the experiments rather than as manifestations of length contraction or time dilation.” This is precisely what VES ether theory does.
There are many other physicists who have expressed their disbelief in relativity that are not reported here, as well as those who believe in an ether theory. Some of these individuals are mentioned in the discussions that follow. I will now return to VES ether theory. Till then be safe and in good health. Kelland—www.vestheory.com
Showing posts with label elastic strings. Show all posts
Showing posts with label elastic strings. Show all posts
Monday, January 30, 2012
Sunday, January 22, 2012
Reflection of light
The Forces of Nature by Kelland Terry, Ph.D
When light shines on the surface of a lake, a portion of the photons enters the water where their paths are bent by refraction. Another portion of the light is reflected off the surface of the lake. If the photon’s virtual particles are ejected down into the lake as water and photon meet, it will cause the photon to enter the water where it will be bent as discussed under refraction. If the photon’s elastic strings are in the same plane as the water surface, the photon will be reflected into space. This causes the reflected photons to be polarized.
The momentum of a visible light photon is 100 billion times greater than a radio wave photon. For this reason, a visible light photon striking a hard, non-polished surface reacts more to the immediate angle it encounters rather than the total surface angle. In contrast, the radio wave will be more influenced by its strings that are strung out across the uneven surface. For this reason, the angle of reflection will be more nearly like the plane of the whole surface.
In the next series of blogs, I will explain how gravitons affect string cycles and the velocity of electrons and photons. Till then be safe and in good health. Kelland—www.vestheory.com
When light shines on the surface of a lake, a portion of the photons enters the water where their paths are bent by refraction. Another portion of the light is reflected off the surface of the lake. If the photon’s virtual particles are ejected down into the lake as water and photon meet, it will cause the photon to enter the water where it will be bent as discussed under refraction. If the photon’s elastic strings are in the same plane as the water surface, the photon will be reflected into space. This causes the reflected photons to be polarized.
The momentum of a visible light photon is 100 billion times greater than a radio wave photon. For this reason, a visible light photon striking a hard, non-polished surface reacts more to the immediate angle it encounters rather than the total surface angle. In contrast, the radio wave will be more influenced by its strings that are strung out across the uneven surface. For this reason, the angle of reflection will be more nearly like the plane of the whole surface.
In the next series of blogs, I will explain how gravitons affect string cycles and the velocity of electrons and photons. Till then be safe and in good health. Kelland—www.vestheory.com
Saturday, January 21, 2012
Polarization of light
The Forces of Nature by Kelland Terry, Ph.D.
Light is polarized when all the electons emanating from photons are oriented in the same direction as depicted in the next illustration.
The two photons are polarized because their electons are oriented in the same plane. There are no electon virtual particles shot toward the viewer nor directly away from the viewer.
If the electons are in the same plane as shown, it is equally true that magnons are also in the same plane, but at a 90 degree angle to the electon plane. Thus they will be either directed toward the viewer or away from the viewer.
Polarization of light can be achieved by shining light through a crystal. Polarization can be so complete that when a second crystal is oriented 90 degrees to the first, the polarized light can not pass through the second crystal.
In the next blog, I will discuss how elastic strings influence reflection of photons off shiny surfaces. Till then be safe and in good health. Kelland—www.vestheory.com
Light is polarized when all the electons emanating from photons are oriented in the same direction as depicted in the next illustration.
The two photons are polarized because their electons are oriented in the same plane. There are no electon virtual particles shot toward the viewer nor directly away from the viewer.
If the electons are in the same plane as shown, it is equally true that magnons are also in the same plane, but at a 90 degree angle to the electon plane. Thus they will be either directed toward the viewer or away from the viewer.
Polarization of light can be achieved by shining light through a crystal. Polarization can be so complete that when a second crystal is oriented 90 degrees to the first, the polarized light can not pass through the second crystal.
In the next blog, I will discuss how elastic strings influence reflection of photons off shiny surfaces. Till then be safe and in good health. Kelland—www.vestheory.com
Monday, December 5, 2011
The moon is trying to escape from Earth’s grasp
The Forces of Nature by Kelland Terry, Ph.D.
Our Moon is moving away from Earth 38.2 centimeters (15 inches) every year. Scientists refer to this as satellite migration. Astrophysicists offer this solution. They believe that ocean tides here on Earth slow down the rate Earth spins on its axis. And in fact, the length of the day is increasing 0.002 seconds per century. What they propose is this: Earth loses momentum every year as its rate of spin decreases because of ocean tides. This momentum is transferred to the Moon which causes the Moon to move away from us. There is an important problem with this interpretation.
Astrophysicists offer us no physical explanation for the transfer of momentum; just that it is transferred, which keeps the sum total of angular momentum constant. Think of a person playing with a hula hoop. The energy of the gyrating individual is transferred to the hoop which causes it to spin. The transfer of energy in this situation is obvious. The individual must be in direct contact with the hoop; otherwise the hoop will stop spinning.
If there is no physical contact between Earth and Moon, why should the movement of our tides influence migration?
Second, some astrophysicists have proposed that the slow spin rate of Venus and Mercury might be due to the tidal interaction between these planets and the Sun. However, tides cannot be responsible for this observation because Venus and Mercury have no oceans, which means tides would have to occur in solid bodies. Or paraphrasing Shakespeare “something must be wrong in Denmark”. Kelland—www.vestheory.com
Our Moon is moving away from Earth 38.2 centimeters (15 inches) every year. Scientists refer to this as satellite migration. Astrophysicists offer this solution. They believe that ocean tides here on Earth slow down the rate Earth spins on its axis. And in fact, the length of the day is increasing 0.002 seconds per century. What they propose is this: Earth loses momentum every year as its rate of spin decreases because of ocean tides. This momentum is transferred to the Moon which causes the Moon to move away from us. There is an important problem with this interpretation.
Astrophysicists offer us no physical explanation for the transfer of momentum; just that it is transferred, which keeps the sum total of angular momentum constant. Think of a person playing with a hula hoop. The energy of the gyrating individual is transferred to the hoop which causes it to spin. The transfer of energy in this situation is obvious. The individual must be in direct contact with the hoop; otherwise the hoop will stop spinning.
If there is no physical contact between Earth and Moon, why should the movement of our tides influence migration?
Second, some astrophysicists have proposed that the slow spin rate of Venus and Mercury might be due to the tidal interaction between these planets and the Sun. However, tides cannot be responsible for this observation because Venus and Mercury have no oceans, which means tides would have to occur in solid bodies. Or paraphrasing Shakespeare “something must be wrong in Denmark”. Kelland—www.vestheory.com
Saturday, December 3, 2011
Why do planets rotate in the same plane?
The Forces of Nature by Kelland Terry, Ph.D.
When we were kids and not plugged into a TV, we frequently had to invent something to do. On occasion I tied a string to a tin can filled with dirt. I then caused the can to rotate around my head by rotating my hand. The rotating can came to rest in a plane dictated by my rotating hand. Obviously, I had too much time on my hands, or perhaps this activity relieved me of hoeing the garden for a few minutes. Now I see that the rotating tin can is analogous to the rotation of the planets in our solar system.
The planets in our solar system tend to rotate in a similar plane like tops on a table. This occurs because the planets are physically connected to the Sun with graviton strings, just like the tin can was physically connected to my hand by a string. As the Sun spins on its axis, it drags the planets through space, which causes them to move into the same alignment like tops spinning on a table. The Sun is a huge massive body, and it spins faster than the planets rotate. This allows the spinning Sun to dictate the plane of rotation for all the planets in the solar system. Kelland—www.vestheory.com
When we were kids and not plugged into a TV, we frequently had to invent something to do. On occasion I tied a string to a tin can filled with dirt. I then caused the can to rotate around my head by rotating my hand. The rotating can came to rest in a plane dictated by my rotating hand. Obviously, I had too much time on my hands, or perhaps this activity relieved me of hoeing the garden for a few minutes. Now I see that the rotating tin can is analogous to the rotation of the planets in our solar system.
The planets in our solar system tend to rotate in a similar plane like tops on a table. This occurs because the planets are physically connected to the Sun with graviton strings, just like the tin can was physically connected to my hand by a string. As the Sun spins on its axis, it drags the planets through space, which causes them to move into the same alignment like tops spinning on a table. The Sun is a huge massive body, and it spins faster than the planets rotate. This allows the spinning Sun to dictate the plane of rotation for all the planets in the solar system. Kelland—www.vestheory.com
Wednesday, November 30, 2011
Venus spins slowly as predicted by elastic strings
The Forces of Nature by Kelland Terry, Ph.D.
Astrophysicists believe that some cataclysmic event caused Venus to be flipped on its axis because, unlike the other planets, it spins in the opposite direction that it rotates around the Sun.
Venus spins slower than any other planet in our solar system, just 1.81 meters per second. Its slow spin rate is as predicted by elastic string theory because it spins opposite to its rotation about the Sun. The planet is trying to roll inward towards the Sun as it spins on its axis; all of the other planets spin and roll in the opposite direction. The forces at work are attempting to reverse the spin direction of Venus. This is a slow process that will require millions if not billions of years for the planet to completely reverse spin direction and come to a new equilibrium. Kelland—www.vestheory.com
Astrophysicists believe that some cataclysmic event caused Venus to be flipped on its axis because, unlike the other planets, it spins in the opposite direction that it rotates around the Sun.
Venus spins slower than any other planet in our solar system, just 1.81 meters per second. Its slow spin rate is as predicted by elastic string theory because it spins opposite to its rotation about the Sun. The planet is trying to roll inward towards the Sun as it spins on its axis; all of the other planets spin and roll in the opposite direction. The forces at work are attempting to reverse the spin direction of Venus. This is a slow process that will require millions if not billions of years for the planet to completely reverse spin direction and come to a new equilibrium. Kelland—www.vestheory.com
Thursday, October 27, 2011
Elastic strings meet and bond
The Forces of Nature by Kelland Terry, Ph.D.
The space about us contains a vast number of gravitons and other strings that form a dense matrix in space. We can not personally sense them because of their perfect elasticity, their almost insignificant mass, and the great distance they are shot into space. However, in a previous blog, I did explain my own experiments that show us that a spinning Ping-Pong ball is deflected by a magnetic field and continues to curve even in a vacuum. Thus, strings have a physical presence in space, they have mass. This conclusion is supported by various phenomena in our solar system, which I will go into at a later time.
Scientists have shown that magnetic fields and electric fields created by photons emanate from these particles at a 90 degree angle to the particle’s line of flight. It is reasonable that the photon’s strings are at least partially swept to the rear of the particle as it flies through a matrix of gravitons. In the same manner, the electron’s n-magnons and s-magnons are to some extent swept to the rear where they meet and bond as the electron rotates around the proton. Kelland—www.vestheory.com
The space about us contains a vast number of gravitons and other strings that form a dense matrix in space. We can not personally sense them because of their perfect elasticity, their almost insignificant mass, and the great distance they are shot into space. However, in a previous blog, I did explain my own experiments that show us that a spinning Ping-Pong ball is deflected by a magnetic field and continues to curve even in a vacuum. Thus, strings have a physical presence in space, they have mass. This conclusion is supported by various phenomena in our solar system, which I will go into at a later time.
Scientists have shown that magnetic fields and electric fields created by photons emanate from these particles at a 90 degree angle to the particle’s line of flight. It is reasonable that the photon’s strings are at least partially swept to the rear of the particle as it flies through a matrix of gravitons. In the same manner, the electron’s n-magnons and s-magnons are to some extent swept to the rear where they meet and bond as the electron rotates around the proton. Kelland—www.vestheory.com
Friday, October 14, 2011
Virtual particles have great velocity
My companion who raced down from the Eagle Crags with me did not know then that he would become one of the great scientists of his generation; however, I am not surprised. He was superior to most of us because of his intellect, his photographic memory, and his work ethic. His seminal book based on his original careful research has been cited by more than 5000 other scientific publications, and it formed the basis for 13 other Ph.D.s that followed in his footsteps. He is now a retired Professor Emeritus from a major university. He too remembers fondly our flying leap below the Eagle Crags. It is unfortunate that we did not have virtual properties that would have taken us back under the Eagle Crags for a second race to the valley below.
The virtual property of elastic strings means they must be ejected into space and retracted with great velocity. What tangible proof is there that strings travel at such vast, almost inconceivable velocity. Well, first we know that particles of light (photons) travel at the amazing speed of 300000000 meters per second. It only takes a few minutes for light to travel from our sun to earth. This extremely fast almost inconceivable speed must have seemed incredulous when scientists first began measuring the velocity of light more than a hundred years ago. Scientists still question how this is possible.
Secondly, it is an established fact based on numerous experiments that when a photon is split and one of the photons is sent off even kilometers away that modification of one photon instantly modifies the other photon, much, much faster than the speed of light. This was once referred to as quantum weirdness, but now is known as entanglement. I believe the two photons are entangled by elastic strings, which allows almost instant modification of one photon by another. I believe entanglement is direct physical evidence that something travels much faster than the speed of light and this something is elastic strings.
Physicists who believe in special relativity downplay entanglement experiments. They contend that entanglement is a form of communication. What does this mean? The physicists that offer this solution to entanglement offer no physical explanation for this concept, nor do they attempt to explain how it causes entanglement. It doesn’t fit the special theory of relativity that nothing is faster than the speed of light and for this reason most physicists ignore these experiments, just as they ignore many other experiments that don’t fit theory. I cannot find a single experiment that does not fit VES theory.
The virtual property of elastic strings means they must be ejected into space and retracted with great velocity. What tangible proof is there that strings travel at such vast, almost inconceivable velocity. Well, first we know that particles of light (photons) travel at the amazing speed of 300000000 meters per second. It only takes a few minutes for light to travel from our sun to earth. This extremely fast almost inconceivable speed must have seemed incredulous when scientists first began measuring the velocity of light more than a hundred years ago. Scientists still question how this is possible.
Secondly, it is an established fact based on numerous experiments that when a photon is split and one of the photons is sent off even kilometers away that modification of one photon instantly modifies the other photon, much, much faster than the speed of light. This was once referred to as quantum weirdness, but now is known as entanglement. I believe the two photons are entangled by elastic strings, which allows almost instant modification of one photon by another. I believe entanglement is direct physical evidence that something travels much faster than the speed of light and this something is elastic strings.
Physicists who believe in special relativity downplay entanglement experiments. They contend that entanglement is a form of communication. What does this mean? The physicists that offer this solution to entanglement offer no physical explanation for this concept, nor do they attempt to explain how it causes entanglement. It doesn’t fit the special theory of relativity that nothing is faster than the speed of light and for this reason most physicists ignore these experiments, just as they ignore many other experiments that don’t fit theory. I cannot find a single experiment that does not fit VES theory.
Monday, October 10, 2011
Electron is composed of two spheres
The Forces of Nature by Kelland Terry, Ph.D.
It is my understanding now that a civet cat is vegetarian, which probably explains why it didn’t bite my toes that it seemed to sniff with pleasure. To me a cat was a cat, and a cat was a carnivore, and here he was sniffing my toes while I remained absolutely frozen in place. Fortunately, this curious, wild animal finished smelling my feet, then climbed underneath my chair and began scratching away at something. I slowly let out a sigh of relief. That night when I prepared for bed, I thought perhaps I could entice the civet cat to leave the house. To this end, I cut an apple into pieces and made a trail of apple parts from the chair to the porch outside the house where I left the apple core. I left the front door open and went to bed. What happened next was not expected.
Just as there must be male and female civet cats to make little civet cats, there must be a division of the electron if it makes n-magnons and s-magnons because these two strings have the same mass but different composition. The electron must be divided into two spheres. One sphere is composed of a substance I call s-goo and the other sphere is composed of n-goo. The same considerations must apply to photons (particles of light) and quarks since both of these particles create n-magnons and s-magnons.
I have developed a model that explains how electrons are divided into two spheres, and a model that explains the self induction of the forces of nature. I will return to this subject after I have discussed some additional properties of elastic strings
Kelland—www.vestheory.com
It is my understanding now that a civet cat is vegetarian, which probably explains why it didn’t bite my toes that it seemed to sniff with pleasure. To me a cat was a cat, and a cat was a carnivore, and here he was sniffing my toes while I remained absolutely frozen in place. Fortunately, this curious, wild animal finished smelling my feet, then climbed underneath my chair and began scratching away at something. I slowly let out a sigh of relief. That night when I prepared for bed, I thought perhaps I could entice the civet cat to leave the house. To this end, I cut an apple into pieces and made a trail of apple parts from the chair to the porch outside the house where I left the apple core. I left the front door open and went to bed. What happened next was not expected.
Just as there must be male and female civet cats to make little civet cats, there must be a division of the electron if it makes n-magnons and s-magnons because these two strings have the same mass but different composition. The electron must be divided into two spheres. One sphere is composed of a substance I call s-goo and the other sphere is composed of n-goo. The same considerations must apply to photons (particles of light) and quarks since both of these particles create n-magnons and s-magnons.
I have developed a model that explains how electrons are divided into two spheres, and a model that explains the self induction of the forces of nature. I will return to this subject after I have discussed some additional properties of elastic strings
Kelland—www.vestheory.com
Saturday, October 8, 2011
To summerize a bit
The Forces of Nature by Kelland Terry, Ph.D.
One winter night, I arrived at our old farm house after driving from Salt Lake where I was attending college. It was shortly before Christmas and Mother and my sisters were in Las Vegas. They were expected home the next day. I had a fire in our little stove in the living room, which quickly took the chill out of the room. I removed my shoes and socks, relaxed in a chair next to the stove, and commenced reading a book. I was all alone or so I thought. It wasn’t long until I heard a scratching sound coming from a nearby sofa. Presently, a wild civet cat appeared from the back of the sofa and walked directly over to me. It stopped at my feet and began sniffing my toes up close and personal. I froze! Perhaps at this point, he recognized a kindred spirit, or perhaps a kindred smell. A civet cat is a type of skunk found in southern Utah. It is tawny brown in color and distinctly different from striped skunks, spotted skunks, and ringtail cats. It is longer and slightly smaller than most house cats.
Just as civet cats prove to be complex little creatures so do electrons prove to be complex little particles.
Thus far we have seen:
• Electrons orbit about protons, and in addition, they are free to move through a wire.
• It takes just one electron and one proton to make a hydrogen atom, and many of these same particles along with neutrons (similar to protons but electrically neutral) to make other atoms. That’s it. All atoms are made of the same building blocks, and they all have perfect elasticity.
• Electrons create an excess number of e-electon strings with perfect elasticity.
• Protons create an excess number of p-electon strings with perfect elasticity.
• Electrons become bound to the protons they orbit because e-electons bind to p-electons and when they retract back to their sources it causes a force of attraction. This holds the electron in orbit about the proton.
• When e-electons and p-electons come in contact they neutralize each other. Atoms and earth tend to be neutral because there are an equal number of electrons and protons.
• E-electons and p-electons have the same mass but different composition.
• When two e-electrons meet there is a force of repulsion between them because two e-electons have the same mass and the same composition. This is also true for two p-electons.
Electrons also create magnetic fields.
• An electron emits n-magnons at one end of the particle and s-magnons at the other end of the particle.
• N-magnons and s-magnons have the same mass but different composition. Their masses differ from electons.
• When n-magnons meet with s-magnons they bond together and when they retract back to their sources it causes a force of attraction.
• When n-magnons meet other n-magnons, it creates a force of repulsion because they have the same mass and the same composition. The same is true for two s-magnons. Till then, be safe and in good health. Kelland—www.vestheory.com
One winter night, I arrived at our old farm house after driving from Salt Lake where I was attending college. It was shortly before Christmas and Mother and my sisters were in Las Vegas. They were expected home the next day. I had a fire in our little stove in the living room, which quickly took the chill out of the room. I removed my shoes and socks, relaxed in a chair next to the stove, and commenced reading a book. I was all alone or so I thought. It wasn’t long until I heard a scratching sound coming from a nearby sofa. Presently, a wild civet cat appeared from the back of the sofa and walked directly over to me. It stopped at my feet and began sniffing my toes up close and personal. I froze! Perhaps at this point, he recognized a kindred spirit, or perhaps a kindred smell. A civet cat is a type of skunk found in southern Utah. It is tawny brown in color and distinctly different from striped skunks, spotted skunks, and ringtail cats. It is longer and slightly smaller than most house cats.
Just as civet cats prove to be complex little creatures so do electrons prove to be complex little particles.
Thus far we have seen:
• Electrons orbit about protons, and in addition, they are free to move through a wire.
• It takes just one electron and one proton to make a hydrogen atom, and many of these same particles along with neutrons (similar to protons but electrically neutral) to make other atoms. That’s it. All atoms are made of the same building blocks, and they all have perfect elasticity.
• Electrons create an excess number of e-electon strings with perfect elasticity.
• Protons create an excess number of p-electon strings with perfect elasticity.
• Electrons become bound to the protons they orbit because e-electons bind to p-electons and when they retract back to their sources it causes a force of attraction. This holds the electron in orbit about the proton.
• When e-electons and p-electons come in contact they neutralize each other. Atoms and earth tend to be neutral because there are an equal number of electrons and protons.
• E-electons and p-electons have the same mass but different composition.
• When two e-electrons meet there is a force of repulsion between them because two e-electons have the same mass and the same composition. This is also true for two p-electons.
Electrons also create magnetic fields.
• An electron emits n-magnons at one end of the particle and s-magnons at the other end of the particle.
• N-magnons and s-magnons have the same mass but different composition. Their masses differ from electons.
• When n-magnons meet with s-magnons they bond together and when they retract back to their sources it causes a force of attraction.
• When n-magnons meet other n-magnons, it creates a force of repulsion because they have the same mass and the same composition. The same is true for two s-magnons. Till then, be safe and in good health. Kelland—www.vestheory.com
Thursday, October 6, 2011
Positive and negative electric currents
The Forces of Nature by Kelland Terry, Ph.D.
One summer not long after I graduated from high school, I was surveying near Blanding, Utah. I was following in the foot steps of my dad who by this time had been for several years a resident engineer for the State of Utah. This summer he was in charge of building a road near Escalante, Utah. I was not mentally prepared for the horrible phone call from home telling me that Dad had been electrocuted. A young man who arrived on the job from Salt Lake had been operating an apparatus that took soil samples. The boon associated with his equipment hit an over head electrical line, and Dad made the fatal mistake of trying to knock him free.
The electrons flowing through the electric wire created a strong negative electric current that consisted of elastic strings I refer to as e-electons. The e-electons racing through Dad and the young man’s body caused the electrons in their bodies to move towards the ground they stood on with great velocity. The friction created by the surging electrons caused their temperatures to rise to a lethal level. Even Dad’s glasses melted, and so we must imagine that the proteins in his body congealed much like the white of an egg congeals when cooked.
There are two forces at work. First, the abundant e-electons racing down the wire (negative current) forced Dad’s electrons towards ground because of repulsion forces. Second, when the negative current created reached the earth, it drove the electrons in the ground away from their protons. These protons then sent a positive current (p-electons) back through the wire. The p-electons became bound to the e-electons, and when the two retracted back to their sources, it caused a force of attraction that pulled Dad’s electrons toward the ground.
In a similar manner, when you throw an electric light switch, all the electrons in the wire begin moving forward almost at the same time, even in the tungsten filament that may be a great distance away. When the electrons move through the crowed conditions of the tungsten filament, it causes the filament to heat up and emit light almost instantly even through the electrons move rather slowly through the wire. They don’t need to be moving too fast because the e-electons and p-electons move through the wire with great velocity, and they are responsible for forcing the electrons through the tungsten filament. Till then, be safe and in good health. Kelland—www.vestheory.com
One summer not long after I graduated from high school, I was surveying near Blanding, Utah. I was following in the foot steps of my dad who by this time had been for several years a resident engineer for the State of Utah. This summer he was in charge of building a road near Escalante, Utah. I was not mentally prepared for the horrible phone call from home telling me that Dad had been electrocuted. A young man who arrived on the job from Salt Lake had been operating an apparatus that took soil samples. The boon associated with his equipment hit an over head electrical line, and Dad made the fatal mistake of trying to knock him free.
The electrons flowing through the electric wire created a strong negative electric current that consisted of elastic strings I refer to as e-electons. The e-electons racing through Dad and the young man’s body caused the electrons in their bodies to move towards the ground they stood on with great velocity. The friction created by the surging electrons caused their temperatures to rise to a lethal level. Even Dad’s glasses melted, and so we must imagine that the proteins in his body congealed much like the white of an egg congeals when cooked.
There are two forces at work. First, the abundant e-electons racing down the wire (negative current) forced Dad’s electrons towards ground because of repulsion forces. Second, when the negative current created reached the earth, it drove the electrons in the ground away from their protons. These protons then sent a positive current (p-electons) back through the wire. The p-electons became bound to the e-electons, and when the two retracted back to their sources, it caused a force of attraction that pulled Dad’s electrons toward the ground.
In a similar manner, when you throw an electric light switch, all the electrons in the wire begin moving forward almost at the same time, even in the tungsten filament that may be a great distance away. When the electrons move through the crowed conditions of the tungsten filament, it causes the filament to heat up and emit light almost instantly even through the electrons move rather slowly through the wire. They don’t need to be moving too fast because the e-electons and p-electons move through the wire with great velocity, and they are responsible for forcing the electrons through the tungsten filament. Till then, be safe and in good health. Kelland—www.vestheory.com
Wednesday, October 5, 2011
Elastic strings for the magnetic force
The Forces of Nature by Kelland Terry, Ph.D.
I can’t think of anything that ushers in stronger memories and emotions than the wonderful aroma of baking bread. Almost at once I can see my mother blending together flour, water and the other ingredients needed to make bread. I can still picture the flour spread on our little kitchen table and her busy hands as she added the ingredients, and kneaded the dough, even though this mental image became part of me some 70 years ago. This picture is worth a zillion dollars, and it’s always with me, not hung on some wall. I am connected to her forever, like the two poles of a magnet are connected to each other, yet I have not seen her for nearly a half century. Memories are puzzling, perhaps even more puzzling, than the magnetic forces.
Scientists have shown that an iron magnet owes its magnetic properties to its electrons; the same little particles that create the electric current. The electron only creates an excess number of e-electon strings, but it does have two poles. The north pole of the electron creates n-magnons and the south pole creates s-magnons. The two strings have the same mass but different composition. When n-magnons bond to s-magnons and then retract, it causes a force of attraction. A force of repulsion is set up when identical strings meet. This relationship is the same as the interaction between e-electons and p-electons that are responsible for the electric forces.
The area between the north pole and south pole of a magnet creates a strong barrier to spinning electrons and spinning Ping-Pong balls because n-magnons are bound to s-magnons. I refer to them collectively as magnons. Till then, be safe and in good health. Kelland—www.vestheory.com
I can’t think of anything that ushers in stronger memories and emotions than the wonderful aroma of baking bread. Almost at once I can see my mother blending together flour, water and the other ingredients needed to make bread. I can still picture the flour spread on our little kitchen table and her busy hands as she added the ingredients, and kneaded the dough, even though this mental image became part of me some 70 years ago. This picture is worth a zillion dollars, and it’s always with me, not hung on some wall. I am connected to her forever, like the two poles of a magnet are connected to each other, yet I have not seen her for nearly a half century. Memories are puzzling, perhaps even more puzzling, than the magnetic forces.
Scientists have shown that an iron magnet owes its magnetic properties to its electrons; the same little particles that create the electric current. The electron only creates an excess number of e-electon strings, but it does have two poles. The north pole of the electron creates n-magnons and the south pole creates s-magnons. The two strings have the same mass but different composition. When n-magnons bond to s-magnons and then retract, it causes a force of attraction. A force of repulsion is set up when identical strings meet. This relationship is the same as the interaction between e-electons and p-electons that are responsible for the electric forces.
The area between the north pole and south pole of a magnet creates a strong barrier to spinning electrons and spinning Ping-Pong balls because n-magnons are bound to s-magnons. I refer to them collectively as magnons. Till then, be safe and in good health. Kelland—www.vestheory.com
Tuesday, October 4, 2011
Force of repulsion between electrons
The Forces of Nature by Kelland Terry, Ph.D.
When we were kids, my two younger sisters and I would take the rubber balloons we had blown up and rub them against our clothing. This caused the balloons to become electrically charged. I have since learned that electrons flow from clothing to a rubber balloon giving the balloon a surplus of electrons with a negative charge. When two such balloons are brought close together, a force of repulsion develops between them and the balloons are forced apart.
Two electrons repel each other; it is called a force of repulsion. When an e-electon from one electron meets an e-electon from another electron, the e-electons likely bond in some fashion, and because of the bonding, the heads of the e-electons are sent crashing against the opposing electrons. Thus, the e-electons with mass and momentum become battering rams that drive the electrons apart. Viola, we now have a force of repulsion. Thus, we come to this conclusion. A force of repulsion is caused when two strings of identical mass and identical composition meet. Till then, be safe and in good health. Kelland—www.vestheory.com
When we were kids, my two younger sisters and I would take the rubber balloons we had blown up and rub them against our clothing. This caused the balloons to become electrically charged. I have since learned that electrons flow from clothing to a rubber balloon giving the balloon a surplus of electrons with a negative charge. When two such balloons are brought close together, a force of repulsion develops between them and the balloons are forced apart.
Two electrons repel each other; it is called a force of repulsion. When an e-electon from one electron meets an e-electon from another electron, the e-electons likely bond in some fashion, and because of the bonding, the heads of the e-electons are sent crashing against the opposing electrons. Thus, the e-electons with mass and momentum become battering rams that drive the electrons apart. Viola, we now have a force of repulsion. Thus, we come to this conclusion. A force of repulsion is caused when two strings of identical mass and identical composition meet. Till then, be safe and in good health. Kelland—www.vestheory.com
Monday, October 3, 2011
The mating dance between strings
The Forces of Nature by Kelland Terry, Ph.D.
The hundred chicks Dad brought home were soon laying eggs in and around the barnyard. We never kept them cooped up after they became adults. There was one nest that could only be checked for eggs by crawling under the manger where I fed our cow its ration of rolled oats. Dad must have planned for a lot of cows because it was a long manger. Not only that, the nest was partially hidden by another barrier. All in all I had to crawl some 15 feet to get to the nest. It was pretty dark and musty under there. On this day as I approached the nest on my belly, I heard the unmistaken sound of a rattlesnake. I was close enough at this point to spot his flat head and body raised above the nest ready to strike. He wanted the eggs more than I did, so I quickly backed out. In the end we decapitated the snake--that’s life on a farm.
There are few things more ritualistic than two snakes in a mating dance with their bodies entwined from head to tail. Perhaps something like this occurs between strings to form a force of attraction. In the case of the electric force, an e-electon emanating from an electron and a p-electon emanating from a proton meet in space and become much like the snakes with their bodies entwined and their heads directed away from the electrons and protons that created the strings. Thus, e-electons and p-electons meet in a mating dance, and when the elastic strings retract back to their respective sources, the attachment between strings provides a strong source of resistance and the two bodies are pulled towards each other. Voila, you now have a force of attraction between proton and electron. A force of attraction occurs when two strings with the same mass but different composition meet and bond. Till then, be safe and in good health. Kelland—www.vestheory.com
The hundred chicks Dad brought home were soon laying eggs in and around the barnyard. We never kept them cooped up after they became adults. There was one nest that could only be checked for eggs by crawling under the manger where I fed our cow its ration of rolled oats. Dad must have planned for a lot of cows because it was a long manger. Not only that, the nest was partially hidden by another barrier. All in all I had to crawl some 15 feet to get to the nest. It was pretty dark and musty under there. On this day as I approached the nest on my belly, I heard the unmistaken sound of a rattlesnake. I was close enough at this point to spot his flat head and body raised above the nest ready to strike. He wanted the eggs more than I did, so I quickly backed out. In the end we decapitated the snake--that’s life on a farm.
There are few things more ritualistic than two snakes in a mating dance with their bodies entwined from head to tail. Perhaps something like this occurs between strings to form a force of attraction. In the case of the electric force, an e-electon emanating from an electron and a p-electon emanating from a proton meet in space and become much like the snakes with their bodies entwined and their heads directed away from the electrons and protons that created the strings. Thus, e-electons and p-electons meet in a mating dance, and when the elastic strings retract back to their respective sources, the attachment between strings provides a strong source of resistance and the two bodies are pulled towards each other. Voila, you now have a force of attraction between proton and electron. A force of attraction occurs when two strings with the same mass but different composition meet and bond. Till then, be safe and in good health. Kelland—www.vestheory.com
Sunday, October 2, 2011
Electons: elastic strings of the electric force
The Forces of Nature by Kelland Terry, Ph.D.
Shortly before World War II ended, Dad quit being a civil engineer and began to develop the land he and mother had homesteaded. He built miles of fencing to allow cattle and sheep to graze on the property, and he built a reservoir with a team of horses and a scraper, and he built ditches to carry water to garden and trees. One day Dad had a team of horses hitched up to a scraper, and the two of us walked along, pitching rocks on the scraper to be hauled away. He was trying to clear the land to plant alfalfa and fruit trees. For some reason Dad had the team of horses stopped, and he was busily engaged down between scraper and horses while I played nearby. To my horror the horses started forward with Dad trapped between scrapper and horses. For a moment, I thought something I had done was going to kill Dad. Fortunately, he was an agile man, and he jumped out of harms way before the scraper could grind him into the dirt. Now, the amazing part: Instead of chewing me out, he unhitched the scraper and ran the horses in a circle until they were ready to drop. He never did say a word to me.
The horses circling around Dad remind me of the electron circling around a proton. Dad held the horses in check with the reins, and in the same manner, the electron that orbits a proton is held in check by elastic strings. This stops the electron from escaping.
Electrons and protons are an integral part of all atoms. In fact the hydrogen atom is composed entirely of one electron and one proton. The proton is 1836 times more massive than the electron, but the negative electric field created by the electron is exactly equal to the positive electric field created by the proton. They completely neutralize each other; thus, the hydrogen atom is electrically neutral as well as all other atoms if they have not lost an electron.
The negative electric field created by electrons is composed of elastic strings that I call e-electons. The positive electric field created by protons is composed of elastic strings that I call p-electons. When e-electons meet p-electons, a strong mechanical bond forms between them and this holds the electron in orbit. In nature there are an equal number of electrons and protons, and for this reason the earth tends to be electrically neutral. Till then, be safe and in good health. Kelland—www.vestheory.com
Shortly before World War II ended, Dad quit being a civil engineer and began to develop the land he and mother had homesteaded. He built miles of fencing to allow cattle and sheep to graze on the property, and he built a reservoir with a team of horses and a scraper, and he built ditches to carry water to garden and trees. One day Dad had a team of horses hitched up to a scraper, and the two of us walked along, pitching rocks on the scraper to be hauled away. He was trying to clear the land to plant alfalfa and fruit trees. For some reason Dad had the team of horses stopped, and he was busily engaged down between scraper and horses while I played nearby. To my horror the horses started forward with Dad trapped between scrapper and horses. For a moment, I thought something I had done was going to kill Dad. Fortunately, he was an agile man, and he jumped out of harms way before the scraper could grind him into the dirt. Now, the amazing part: Instead of chewing me out, he unhitched the scraper and ran the horses in a circle until they were ready to drop. He never did say a word to me.
The horses circling around Dad remind me of the electron circling around a proton. Dad held the horses in check with the reins, and in the same manner, the electron that orbits a proton is held in check by elastic strings. This stops the electron from escaping.
Electrons and protons are an integral part of all atoms. In fact the hydrogen atom is composed entirely of one electron and one proton. The proton is 1836 times more massive than the electron, but the negative electric field created by the electron is exactly equal to the positive electric field created by the proton. They completely neutralize each other; thus, the hydrogen atom is electrically neutral as well as all other atoms if they have not lost an electron.
The negative electric field created by electrons is composed of elastic strings that I call e-electons. The positive electric field created by protons is composed of elastic strings that I call p-electons. When e-electons meet p-electons, a strong mechanical bond forms between them and this holds the electron in orbit. In nature there are an equal number of electrons and protons, and for this reason the earth tends to be electrically neutral. Till then, be safe and in good health. Kelland—www.vestheory.com
Saturday, October 1, 2011
Particles that make elastic strings
The Forces of Nature by Kelland Terry, Ph.D.
Growing up on the farm always gave me plenty to do. For one thing, from the age of 10 on, I milked our cow every night and morning. I had it down pat. I could leave the house on a dead run, feed the cow a helping of oats, milk her, and get back to the house in 10 minutes (okay, maybe this is a slight exaggeration). She was a jersey cow and she gave us about one gallon of milk twice a day. This was a big source of food for our family because not only did we drink lots of milk, Mother also used it to make cottage cheese, gravies, hot cereals, and we ran the milk through a separator that left us with a good supply of cream for Mother to make butter and butter milk. I suspect I always went to school with a slight smell of barnyard and milk cow.
These days I find myself thinking of gravity and the elastic strings that make my theory work. There are three different particles that are known to create force fields. They are photons (small particles that make up light), electrons (tiny particles that orbit protons or flow through an electric wire), and quarks (not much bigger than electrons) that are found inside the nucleus of the atom. Electrons and photons create electric fields, magnetic fields, and gravitational fields. Quarks also create these same fields, and in addition they create the fields responsible for the nuclear forces. The fields are composed of elastic strings, and each force has its own distinctive strings.
Growing up on the farm always gave me plenty to do. For one thing, from the age of 10 on, I milked our cow every night and morning. I had it down pat. I could leave the house on a dead run, feed the cow a helping of oats, milk her, and get back to the house in 10 minutes (okay, maybe this is a slight exaggeration). She was a jersey cow and she gave us about one gallon of milk twice a day. This was a big source of food for our family because not only did we drink lots of milk, Mother also used it to make cottage cheese, gravies, hot cereals, and we ran the milk through a separator that left us with a good supply of cream for Mother to make butter and butter milk. I suspect I always went to school with a slight smell of barnyard and milk cow.
These days I find myself thinking of gravity and the elastic strings that make my theory work. There are three different particles that are known to create force fields. They are photons (small particles that make up light), electrons (tiny particles that orbit protons or flow through an electric wire), and quarks (not much bigger than electrons) that are found inside the nucleus of the atom. Electrons and photons create electric fields, magnetic fields, and gravitational fields. Quarks also create these same fields, and in addition they create the fields responsible for the nuclear forces. The fields are composed of elastic strings, and each force has its own distinctive strings.
Wednesday, September 28, 2011
Experiment showing magnetic fields have mass
The Forces of Nature by Kelland Terry, Ph.D.
I like to tell people that I was spawned in the Virgin River that runs through Rockville because that is where I spent much of my youth during the hot summers. The river ran fairly cold since it came from the mountains around us, which made the sand along its bank mighty enticing. We would chase each other in a game of tag in the river, and then when the cold water chilled our bones, we ran to the bank and covered ourselves with warm sand. It was a luxury that rivals any cell phone or any other modern gadget.
Back then I had no thoughts of magnetism, and no reason to conjure up what bonds might form between the south pole and north pole of a magnet. Do the bonds have physical properties? Now, more than 65 years later, I was faced with the exciting prospect of demonstrating that a magnetic field increases the curvature of a spinning table tennis ball in flight.
A Robo-Pong was used to eject the balls between the north pole and south pole of the three electromagnets we built as explained in the previous blog. A Robo-Pong can be adjusted to either give clockwise or counterclockwise spin to the balls. The experiment was set up in our sun room where there is adequate space to do the experiment. My wife, who is a faculty member at UNR, helped record where the balls struck the target. By the way, I was able to show there is no attraction between the plastic balls and a magnet by attaching a thread to a ball and then suspending it next to the poles of the electromagnet with the electricity turned on. There is no hint of any attraction between the plastic ball and either the north or south pole of the magnets.
One trial consisted of approximately 75 balls that were shot through the three electromagnets with the electricity on and a magnetic field in place, then another 75were shot with the electricity turned off and no magnetic field in place. The data was placed in the computer and averages were calculated.
Altogether 13 trails were made, involving more than a thousand balls. In some cases trials were done with balls curving left and in other cases trials were done with balls curving right. The iron cores showed very little tendency to get warm when the electricity was on, but for good measure, I sometimes shot the controls first and in other trials I shot the experimental first (electricity on).
Now for the results: No matter how I designed the experiment, the balls curved more when the magnetic field was turned on. They curved more left when given counterclockwise spin and more right when given clockwise spin. There was never any overlap between the controls and experimental values. Conclusion: Spinning table tennis balls curve more when shot between the north pole and south pole of a magnet because they encounter a magnetic field that has mass. When the balls spin against the elastic strings (magnons), it causes them to curve more. Wow! This is truly amazing. I believe the magnetic field is composed of elastic strings that have mass. This is wonderful confirmation for my experiments that show spinning table tennis balls in flight curve in a complete vacuum. You can read this experiment in its entirety at my web site, just click on chapter 31. Till then, be safe and in good health. Kelland—www.vestheory.com
I like to tell people that I was spawned in the Virgin River that runs through Rockville because that is where I spent much of my youth during the hot summers. The river ran fairly cold since it came from the mountains around us, which made the sand along its bank mighty enticing. We would chase each other in a game of tag in the river, and then when the cold water chilled our bones, we ran to the bank and covered ourselves with warm sand. It was a luxury that rivals any cell phone or any other modern gadget.
Back then I had no thoughts of magnetism, and no reason to conjure up what bonds might form between the south pole and north pole of a magnet. Do the bonds have physical properties? Now, more than 65 years later, I was faced with the exciting prospect of demonstrating that a magnetic field increases the curvature of a spinning table tennis ball in flight.
A Robo-Pong was used to eject the balls between the north pole and south pole of the three electromagnets we built as explained in the previous blog. A Robo-Pong can be adjusted to either give clockwise or counterclockwise spin to the balls. The experiment was set up in our sun room where there is adequate space to do the experiment. My wife, who is a faculty member at UNR, helped record where the balls struck the target. By the way, I was able to show there is no attraction between the plastic balls and a magnet by attaching a thread to a ball and then suspending it next to the poles of the electromagnet with the electricity turned on. There is no hint of any attraction between the plastic ball and either the north or south pole of the magnets.
One trial consisted of approximately 75 balls that were shot through the three electromagnets with the electricity on and a magnetic field in place, then another 75were shot with the electricity turned off and no magnetic field in place. The data was placed in the computer and averages were calculated.
Altogether 13 trails were made, involving more than a thousand balls. In some cases trials were done with balls curving left and in other cases trials were done with balls curving right. The iron cores showed very little tendency to get warm when the electricity was on, but for good measure, I sometimes shot the controls first and in other trials I shot the experimental first (electricity on).
Now for the results: No matter how I designed the experiment, the balls curved more when the magnetic field was turned on. They curved more left when given counterclockwise spin and more right when given clockwise spin. There was never any overlap between the controls and experimental values. Conclusion: Spinning table tennis balls curve more when shot between the north pole and south pole of a magnet because they encounter a magnetic field that has mass. When the balls spin against the elastic strings (magnons), it causes them to curve more. Wow! This is truly amazing. I believe the magnetic field is composed of elastic strings that have mass. This is wonderful confirmation for my experiments that show spinning table tennis balls in flight curve in a complete vacuum. You can read this experiment in its entirety at my web site, just click on chapter 31. Till then, be safe and in good health. Kelland—www.vestheory.com
Monday, September 19, 2011
Elasticity
Atoms have perfect elasticity
The Forces of Nature by Kelland Terry, Ph.D.
Mother saved the day for our family when Dad decided to give up engineering and try to make a living off our old farm. We would have starved to death except we always had a large garden and Mother bottled hundreds of quarts of green beans, wax beans, whole tomatoes, tomato juice, peaches, apricots, apples, and other vegetables and fruit. Even the fields around us contributed asparagus and wild currants in the fence lines. The wild currants made excellent jam. It was my job, along with my two younger sisters, to wash the quart jars, peel the apples, etc. It was a family work project.
The canning jars had a tight rubber seal that kept air from entering the bottles, which brings me to the main point. Scientists have shown that air molecules inside a sealed empty bottle never come to rest. This is quite amazing if you think about it. When two air molecules have a head on collision, they move away from each other with the same speed they had before the collision. Physicists refer to this as perfect elasticity. For this reason, air molecules never fall to the bottom of the chamber and come to rest even though they are under the influence of gravity. Since all molecules are made of the same building blocks we know all molecules have perfect elasticity. The evidence for the elasticity of matter is all around us. Doesn’t this suggest to you that the forces of nature might be due to elastic strings? Till then, be safe and in good health. Kelland—www.vestheory.com
Atoms have perfect cohesion
The Forces of Nature by Kelland Terry, Ph.D.
When I was young and foolish, some of my friends in grade school would come to our old ranch in the middle of a rain storm, usually in the month of August, and race about on the hillsides in back of our little house. In particular I remember one such friend who later became the beloved head track coach for a major university. At the time, he unknowingly was in training for the high hurdles he later ran in high school.
Of course we didn’t want to get our clothes muddy and wet so we went naked. The hills were steep and we could jump a country mile and land in soft earth that gave beneath our feet. It was an exhilarating experience made more beautiful by blessed rain that made the earth and desert plants fill the air with the most wonderful aromas.
It is astounding to me that the earth beneath our feet, and all the surrounding matter to the most distant star, none of it can not be destroyed, not even the smallest molecule. Atoms and the subatomic particles that make up atoms have perfect cohesion, just as they have perfect elasticity. The temperature of our Sun reaches 20,000 degrees Celsius while 5,000 degrees Celsius is sufficient to vaporize all known materials. This means the mass of the atom must be subjected to a violent state of motion, yet the mass does not disperse randomly into the ether about it, rather it remains intact, impervious to the rapid oscillation and rapid motion of the atoms around it. Mass may redistribute itself into different subatomic particles, but it cannot be destroyed. It has perfect cohesion, a condition of perfect elasticity.
This explains why elastic strings can extend vast distances and still remain intact, and coupled with perfect elasticity, it explains why elastic strings retract back to their source with great velocity.
Gluons are elastic strings
The Forces of Nature by Kelland Terry, Ph.D.
My aunt owned and ran the only grocery store in our little town. We often played touch football on her lawn where all too frequently we banged into the side of the store wall that was covered with ivy. We didn’t seem to mind even though the wall was made of concrete.
I remember vividly when my aunt announced to us just outside her store one day that World War II had ended. All the kids had their hands in the air, waving and yelling that we had won the war. Scientists had found a way to overcome the strong nuclear force, which allowed them to build nuclear bombs. These bombs abruptly ended the war with Japan.
Quarks are small structures that make up approximately 2% of the mass of an atom. They are responsible for the strong nuclear forces that hold subatomic particles together. If it were not for this force, atoms would fly apart just as they did with the explosion of the nuclear bomb. Physicists have shown that quarks are found in groups of three held together by gluons. Gluons are responsible for the force of attraction that holds quarks together. They are responsible for the strong nuclear force, and they behave as though they are elastic strings. Nuclear physicists have shown that when quarks are forced apart, gluons pull them back together. And just like rubber bands, the farther gluons are stretched the greater the force pulling the quarks back together. Could we ask for better proof of elastic strings? Till then, be safe and in good health. Kelland—www.vestheory.com
Electons are elastic strings
The Forces of Nature by Kelland Terry, Ph.D.
When I was growing up in Rockville, the boys played a game called “rubbers”. We would cut a half inch wide strip of rubber from a car inner tube made of natural rubber that was about 18 inches long. The rubber bands were shot with considerable velocity by placing one end around the index finger, then holding the tip in place with the thumb. We would stretch the rubber band with the other hand and then send the missile flying towards someone on the opposite team. Head shots were not permissible. When you were hit you were out of the game. The old barnyards became our playgrounds with fresh cow pies being acceptable hazards. I still remember sucking in my midsection to avoid being hit as a rubber band came whizzing toward me. We played the game by the hour.
I never thought much about what caused a rubber to stretch nor what caused the rubber band to retract with such great force until I began exploring the forces of nature. Now I see that it provides elegant proof that the bonds connecting atoms have elastic properties. In this case, we are dealing with the electric force of nature. I call the strings electons.
Here is what one physicist had to say on the subject: In 2011 on the Internet, Professor Marvin Johnson, a physicist at California State University, sums up his views as follows: “The bonds between atoms in a solid or liquid act like springs, when you compress or stretch them they store potential energy.” It sounds as if Johnson is describing atoms with perfect elasticity that are connected with strings that have perfect elasticity. When compressed, the atoms bound away from each other with perfect elasticity, and when stretched apart, they retract with greater force because they are connected with strings that have perfect elasticity. Till then, be safe and in good health. Kelland—www.vestheory.com
Gravitons are elastic strings
The Forces of Nature by Kelland Terry, Ph.D.
If you are lucky enough to view the night sky in a small town where humans are not flooding it with light, you are treated with a sea of brilliant stars that light the heavens, and the Milky Way Galaxy unfolds before you like a master piece far more pleasing than Van Gogh’s starry night. And lo, unknown to most viewers, the stars themselves have an intriguing secrete, a secrete that has puzzled scientists for many decades.
Astrophysicists have shown that the stars in our galaxy rotate around its center with great velocity, approximately 225,000 meters per second. The weird thing is the force of gravity in our galaxy is supposedly not strong enough to hold the stars in orbit. They should fly off into space, but they don’t. They also know that the force of gravity has to increase the farther the star is from the galactic center. At great distance, the actual force of gravity has to be 10 times stronger than the normal force of gravity to hold the star in orbit. Although scientists have attempted to explain this phenomenon by proposing additional undetected matter in our galaxy, all the studies have come up negative. The evidence shows there is no so called “dark matter.” The conclusion is: gravity behaves as though it is due to elastic strings, in the same manner as gluons (string responsible for the strong nuclear force), and electons (strings responsible for the electrical force). Once more we find great evidence for elastic strings. Kelland—www.vestheory.com
The Forces of Nature by Kelland Terry, Ph.D.
Mother saved the day for our family when Dad decided to give up engineering and try to make a living off our old farm. We would have starved to death except we always had a large garden and Mother bottled hundreds of quarts of green beans, wax beans, whole tomatoes, tomato juice, peaches, apricots, apples, and other vegetables and fruit. Even the fields around us contributed asparagus and wild currants in the fence lines. The wild currants made excellent jam. It was my job, along with my two younger sisters, to wash the quart jars, peel the apples, etc. It was a family work project.
The canning jars had a tight rubber seal that kept air from entering the bottles, which brings me to the main point. Scientists have shown that air molecules inside a sealed empty bottle never come to rest. This is quite amazing if you think about it. When two air molecules have a head on collision, they move away from each other with the same speed they had before the collision. Physicists refer to this as perfect elasticity. For this reason, air molecules never fall to the bottom of the chamber and come to rest even though they are under the influence of gravity. Since all molecules are made of the same building blocks we know all molecules have perfect elasticity. The evidence for the elasticity of matter is all around us. Doesn’t this suggest to you that the forces of nature might be due to elastic strings? Till then, be safe and in good health. Kelland—www.vestheory.com
Atoms have perfect cohesion
The Forces of Nature by Kelland Terry, Ph.D.
When I was young and foolish, some of my friends in grade school would come to our old ranch in the middle of a rain storm, usually in the month of August, and race about on the hillsides in back of our little house. In particular I remember one such friend who later became the beloved head track coach for a major university. At the time, he unknowingly was in training for the high hurdles he later ran in high school.
Of course we didn’t want to get our clothes muddy and wet so we went naked. The hills were steep and we could jump a country mile and land in soft earth that gave beneath our feet. It was an exhilarating experience made more beautiful by blessed rain that made the earth and desert plants fill the air with the most wonderful aromas.
It is astounding to me that the earth beneath our feet, and all the surrounding matter to the most distant star, none of it can not be destroyed, not even the smallest molecule. Atoms and the subatomic particles that make up atoms have perfect cohesion, just as they have perfect elasticity. The temperature of our Sun reaches 20,000 degrees Celsius while 5,000 degrees Celsius is sufficient to vaporize all known materials. This means the mass of the atom must be subjected to a violent state of motion, yet the mass does not disperse randomly into the ether about it, rather it remains intact, impervious to the rapid oscillation and rapid motion of the atoms around it. Mass may redistribute itself into different subatomic particles, but it cannot be destroyed. It has perfect cohesion, a condition of perfect elasticity.
This explains why elastic strings can extend vast distances and still remain intact, and coupled with perfect elasticity, it explains why elastic strings retract back to their source with great velocity.
Gluons are elastic strings
The Forces of Nature by Kelland Terry, Ph.D.
My aunt owned and ran the only grocery store in our little town. We often played touch football on her lawn where all too frequently we banged into the side of the store wall that was covered with ivy. We didn’t seem to mind even though the wall was made of concrete.
I remember vividly when my aunt announced to us just outside her store one day that World War II had ended. All the kids had their hands in the air, waving and yelling that we had won the war. Scientists had found a way to overcome the strong nuclear force, which allowed them to build nuclear bombs. These bombs abruptly ended the war with Japan.
Quarks are small structures that make up approximately 2% of the mass of an atom. They are responsible for the strong nuclear forces that hold subatomic particles together. If it were not for this force, atoms would fly apart just as they did with the explosion of the nuclear bomb. Physicists have shown that quarks are found in groups of three held together by gluons. Gluons are responsible for the force of attraction that holds quarks together. They are responsible for the strong nuclear force, and they behave as though they are elastic strings. Nuclear physicists have shown that when quarks are forced apart, gluons pull them back together. And just like rubber bands, the farther gluons are stretched the greater the force pulling the quarks back together. Could we ask for better proof of elastic strings? Till then, be safe and in good health. Kelland—www.vestheory.com
Electons are elastic strings
The Forces of Nature by Kelland Terry, Ph.D.
When I was growing up in Rockville, the boys played a game called “rubbers”. We would cut a half inch wide strip of rubber from a car inner tube made of natural rubber that was about 18 inches long. The rubber bands were shot with considerable velocity by placing one end around the index finger, then holding the tip in place with the thumb. We would stretch the rubber band with the other hand and then send the missile flying towards someone on the opposite team. Head shots were not permissible. When you were hit you were out of the game. The old barnyards became our playgrounds with fresh cow pies being acceptable hazards. I still remember sucking in my midsection to avoid being hit as a rubber band came whizzing toward me. We played the game by the hour.
I never thought much about what caused a rubber to stretch nor what caused the rubber band to retract with such great force until I began exploring the forces of nature. Now I see that it provides elegant proof that the bonds connecting atoms have elastic properties. In this case, we are dealing with the electric force of nature. I call the strings electons.
Here is what one physicist had to say on the subject: In 2011 on the Internet, Professor Marvin Johnson, a physicist at California State University, sums up his views as follows: “The bonds between atoms in a solid or liquid act like springs, when you compress or stretch them they store potential energy.” It sounds as if Johnson is describing atoms with perfect elasticity that are connected with strings that have perfect elasticity. When compressed, the atoms bound away from each other with perfect elasticity, and when stretched apart, they retract with greater force because they are connected with strings that have perfect elasticity. Till then, be safe and in good health. Kelland—www.vestheory.com
Gravitons are elastic strings
The Forces of Nature by Kelland Terry, Ph.D.
If you are lucky enough to view the night sky in a small town where humans are not flooding it with light, you are treated with a sea of brilliant stars that light the heavens, and the Milky Way Galaxy unfolds before you like a master piece far more pleasing than Van Gogh’s starry night. And lo, unknown to most viewers, the stars themselves have an intriguing secrete, a secrete that has puzzled scientists for many decades.
Astrophysicists have shown that the stars in our galaxy rotate around its center with great velocity, approximately 225,000 meters per second. The weird thing is the force of gravity in our galaxy is supposedly not strong enough to hold the stars in orbit. They should fly off into space, but they don’t. They also know that the force of gravity has to increase the farther the star is from the galactic center. At great distance, the actual force of gravity has to be 10 times stronger than the normal force of gravity to hold the star in orbit. Although scientists have attempted to explain this phenomenon by proposing additional undetected matter in our galaxy, all the studies have come up negative. The evidence shows there is no so called “dark matter.” The conclusion is: gravity behaves as though it is due to elastic strings, in the same manner as gluons (string responsible for the strong nuclear force), and electons (strings responsible for the electrical force). Once more we find great evidence for elastic strings. Kelland—www.vestheory.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)