The Forces of Nature by Kelland Terry, Ph.D.
Astrophysicists believe that some cataclysmic event caused Venus to be flipped on its axis because, unlike the other planets, it spins in the opposite direction that it rotates around the Sun.
Venus spins slower than any other planet in our solar system, just 1.81 meters per second. Its slow spin rate is as predicted by elastic string theory because it spins opposite to its rotation about the Sun. The planet is trying to roll inward towards the Sun as it spins on its axis; all of the other planets spin and roll in the opposite direction. The forces at work are attempting to reverse the spin direction of Venus. This is a slow process that will require millions if not billions of years for the planet to completely reverse spin direction and come to a new equilibrium. Kelland—www.vestheory.com
Wednesday, November 30, 2011
Tuesday, November 29, 2011
Predicting spin rate of satellites
The Forces of Nature by Kelland Terry, Ph.D.
Spinning bodies plowing through a dense field of gravitons suggests that gravity, satellite diameter, and satellite momentum can be used to predict spin rate. The question posed is this: Can these three independent variables predict the spin rates for the satellites in our solar system? This was analyzed using regression analysis for our Sun and all the moons and planets in our solar system. There were 26 heavenly bodies used in this analysis.
Now for the results: A regression analysis computes an r value, which is a measurement of goodness of fit for the satellites along a regression line. The closer the r value is to 1.0 the better the fit. In this study r was 0.99, which is pretty close to 1.0. This suggests that 99 percent of the spin rate for of all the spinning bodies in our solar system can be accounted for by their momentum, diameter, and the gravitational force between satellite and central body. For example, the Sun spins on its axis at 1946 meters/second and the predicted rate was also 1946 meters per second. Mars spin rate is 240.8 m/s and its predicted rate was 243 m/s. Saturn’s actual spin rate is 10279 m/s and the predicted value was 10061 m/s.
A little discussion might help. The theory is that the spin of a satellite moving through a dense fabric of elastic strings is influenced in much the same way as a billiard ball striking the side of a pool table. When the ball strikes the cushion, it will promote a spin inward towards the side of the table. In the case of Earth, striking the gravitons emanating from the Sun, it will tend to cause the planet to spin inward toward the Sun. Thus, it will induce the planet to spin in the same direction it orbits the Sun.
Now for the conclusion: The study is as predicted: Satellite spin is controlled by the density of the elastic strings and gravity, diameter of the satellite because this affects its interaction with the graviton matrix, and satellite momentum because a large fast body such as our Sun will be less affected by the graviton matrix it must plow through as it circles the center of the Milky Way Galaxy.
Why is this important? It provides striking evidence that elastic strings have a physical presence in space, which means gravitons must have mass. How else can you explain the results of this experiment? It also is of interest because it explains one of the conundrums of science—what controls the spin rate of satellites.
This study is supported by the following: I have shown that spinning table tennis balls in flight continue to curve even in a complete vacuum, which suggests they are spinning against a graviton matrix in their path. It means gravitons have a physical presence in space; they have mass. This concept is supported by my experiments that show spinning table tennis balls curve more in a magnetic field because, like gravitons, the elastic strings that make up the magnetic field have mass. Kelland—www.vestheory.com
Spinning bodies plowing through a dense field of gravitons suggests that gravity, satellite diameter, and satellite momentum can be used to predict spin rate. The question posed is this: Can these three independent variables predict the spin rates for the satellites in our solar system? This was analyzed using regression analysis for our Sun and all the moons and planets in our solar system. There were 26 heavenly bodies used in this analysis.
Now for the results: A regression analysis computes an r value, which is a measurement of goodness of fit for the satellites along a regression line. The closer the r value is to 1.0 the better the fit. In this study r was 0.99, which is pretty close to 1.0. This suggests that 99 percent of the spin rate for of all the spinning bodies in our solar system can be accounted for by their momentum, diameter, and the gravitational force between satellite and central body. For example, the Sun spins on its axis at 1946 meters/second and the predicted rate was also 1946 meters per second. Mars spin rate is 240.8 m/s and its predicted rate was 243 m/s. Saturn’s actual spin rate is 10279 m/s and the predicted value was 10061 m/s.
A little discussion might help. The theory is that the spin of a satellite moving through a dense fabric of elastic strings is influenced in much the same way as a billiard ball striking the side of a pool table. When the ball strikes the cushion, it will promote a spin inward towards the side of the table. In the case of Earth, striking the gravitons emanating from the Sun, it will tend to cause the planet to spin inward toward the Sun. Thus, it will induce the planet to spin in the same direction it orbits the Sun.
Now for the conclusion: The study is as predicted: Satellite spin is controlled by the density of the elastic strings and gravity, diameter of the satellite because this affects its interaction with the graviton matrix, and satellite momentum because a large fast body such as our Sun will be less affected by the graviton matrix it must plow through as it circles the center of the Milky Way Galaxy.
Why is this important? It provides striking evidence that elastic strings have a physical presence in space, which means gravitons must have mass. How else can you explain the results of this experiment? It also is of interest because it explains one of the conundrums of science—what controls the spin rate of satellites.
This study is supported by the following: I have shown that spinning table tennis balls in flight continue to curve even in a complete vacuum, which suggests they are spinning against a graviton matrix in their path. It means gravitons have a physical presence in space; they have mass. This concept is supported by my experiments that show spinning table tennis balls curve more in a magnetic field because, like gravitons, the elastic strings that make up the magnetic field have mass. Kelland—www.vestheory.com
Monday, November 28, 2011
The connection between spin and rotation
The Forces of Nature by Kelland Terry, Ph.D.
The spin of a planet, or any satellite, is tied to its rotation around a central body.
The concentration of gravitons emanating from our Sun far outnumbers the gravitons from our Milky Way Galaxy because of the close proximity of the Sun to the planets in our solar system. However, gravitons from all sources are vast: they form an interlaced graviton matrix that heavenly bodies must plow through as they orbit their respective central bodies. Let’s examine the Earth-Sun system.
As Earth rotates around the Sun in its elliptical orbit it is constantly striking the Sun’s gravitons at an angle. Because of the angles taken by Earth as it collides with the graviton barrier, it is causing Earth to spin on its axis in the same direction as its orbit. This means the leading edge of Earth is spinning inward towards the Sun. Spin is created much like a billiard ball that begins spinning after it strikes the cushion along the pool table. Here we find that the leading edge of the billiard ball is spinning inward towards the edge of the table.
The Earth, like most rotating bodies, is spinning in the same direction that it rotates around the Sun. This is exactly what you would expect if the leading edge of the planet is rubbing against the gravitons emanating from the Sun.
This helps explain why the strength of the gravitational field, diameter of the planet, and the satellite’s momentum are important factors that influence the spin of a satellite. Kelland—www.vestheory.com
The spin of a planet, or any satellite, is tied to its rotation around a central body.
The concentration of gravitons emanating from our Sun far outnumbers the gravitons from our Milky Way Galaxy because of the close proximity of the Sun to the planets in our solar system. However, gravitons from all sources are vast: they form an interlaced graviton matrix that heavenly bodies must plow through as they orbit their respective central bodies. Let’s examine the Earth-Sun system.
As Earth rotates around the Sun in its elliptical orbit it is constantly striking the Sun’s gravitons at an angle. Because of the angles taken by Earth as it collides with the graviton barrier, it is causing Earth to spin on its axis in the same direction as its orbit. This means the leading edge of Earth is spinning inward towards the Sun. Spin is created much like a billiard ball that begins spinning after it strikes the cushion along the pool table. Here we find that the leading edge of the billiard ball is spinning inward towards the edge of the table.
The Earth, like most rotating bodies, is spinning in the same direction that it rotates around the Sun. This is exactly what you would expect if the leading edge of the planet is rubbing against the gravitons emanating from the Sun.
This helps explain why the strength of the gravitational field, diameter of the planet, and the satellite’s momentum are important factors that influence the spin of a satellite. Kelland—www.vestheory.com
Tuesday, November 22, 2011
Factors that influence spin rate of satellites
The Forces of Nature by Kelland Terry, Ph.D.
Because gravitons influence the spin of satellites in our solar system, it means the diameter of the satellite will influence spin rate because the larger the diameter the greater the surface of the satellite that comes in contact with the graviton matrix. In this case, it is having a positive effect on satellite spin.
However, like gravity, the diameter of the satellite can also have a negative impact on spin rate. The larger the diameter, the greater the leverage that Earth can apply to our Moon to control spin rate. It is much like the use of a long pole to maintain balance by someone walking along a tight wire. Earth’s gravity is pulling down on both sides of the moon, which tends to reduce spin rate.
Momentum also plays a part in the spin rate of a satellite. Momentum is a measurement of mass x velocity. We all know it takes a country mile to stop a train because of its great momentum. In the same manner, our massive Sun moving at great velocity will be affected less by the graviton matrix it plows through as it rotates around the center of the Milky Way Galaxy. Its huge momentum will tend to push aside the matrix, which means its spin will be influenced less by its rotation velocity. Thus, a large momentum is a negative factor influencing spin rate.
The extent that gravity, satellite diameter, and satellite momentum influence spin rate can be measured. This is discussed in my next blog. This is all based on the idea that gravitons form a dense, physical matrix in space that spinning bodies plow through as they orbit some central body. Kelland—www.vestheory.com
Because gravitons influence the spin of satellites in our solar system, it means the diameter of the satellite will influence spin rate because the larger the diameter the greater the surface of the satellite that comes in contact with the graviton matrix. In this case, it is having a positive effect on satellite spin.
However, like gravity, the diameter of the satellite can also have a negative impact on spin rate. The larger the diameter, the greater the leverage that Earth can apply to our Moon to control spin rate. It is much like the use of a long pole to maintain balance by someone walking along a tight wire. Earth’s gravity is pulling down on both sides of the moon, which tends to reduce spin rate.
Momentum also plays a part in the spin rate of a satellite. Momentum is a measurement of mass x velocity. We all know it takes a country mile to stop a train because of its great momentum. In the same manner, our massive Sun moving at great velocity will be affected less by the graviton matrix it plows through as it rotates around the center of the Milky Way Galaxy. Its huge momentum will tend to push aside the matrix, which means its spin will be influenced less by its rotation velocity. Thus, a large momentum is a negative factor influencing spin rate.
The extent that gravity, satellite diameter, and satellite momentum influence spin rate can be measured. This is discussed in my next blog. This is all based on the idea that gravitons form a dense, physical matrix in space that spinning bodies plow through as they orbit some central body. Kelland—www.vestheory.com
Sunday, November 20, 2011
Factors that influence spin rate of satellites
The Forces of Nature by Kelland Terry, Ph.D.
The diameter of the satellite will influence spin rate because the larger the diameter the greater the surface of the satellite that comes in contact with the graviton matrix. In this case, it is having a positive effect on satellite spin.
However, like gravity, the diameter of the satellite can also have a negative impact on spin rate. The larger the diameter, the greater the leverage that Earth can apply to our Moon to control spin rate. It is much like the use of a long pole to maintain balance by someone walking along a tight wire. Earth’s gravity is pulling down on both sides of the moon, which tends to reduce spin rate.
Momentum also plays a part in the spin rate of a satellite. Momentum is a measurement of mass x velocity. We all know it takes a country mile to stop a train because of its great momentum. In the same manner, our massive Sun moving at great velocity will be affected less by the graviton matrix it plows through as it rotates around the center of the Milky Way Galaxy. Its huge momentum will tend to push aside the matrix, which means its spin will be influenced less by its rotation velocity. Thus, a large momentum is a negative factor influencing spin rate.
The extent that gravity, satellite diameter, and satellite momentum influence spin rate can be measured. This is discussed in my next blog. This is all based on the idea that gravitons form a dense, physical matrix in space that spinning bodies plow through as they orbit some central body. Kelland—www.vestheory.com
The diameter of the satellite will influence spin rate because the larger the diameter the greater the surface of the satellite that comes in contact with the graviton matrix. In this case, it is having a positive effect on satellite spin.
However, like gravity, the diameter of the satellite can also have a negative impact on spin rate. The larger the diameter, the greater the leverage that Earth can apply to our Moon to control spin rate. It is much like the use of a long pole to maintain balance by someone walking along a tight wire. Earth’s gravity is pulling down on both sides of the moon, which tends to reduce spin rate.
Momentum also plays a part in the spin rate of a satellite. Momentum is a measurement of mass x velocity. We all know it takes a country mile to stop a train because of its great momentum. In the same manner, our massive Sun moving at great velocity will be affected less by the graviton matrix it plows through as it rotates around the center of the Milky Way Galaxy. Its huge momentum will tend to push aside the matrix, which means its spin will be influenced less by its rotation velocity. Thus, a large momentum is a negative factor influencing spin rate.
The extent that gravity, satellite diameter, and satellite momentum influence spin rate can be measured. This is discussed in my next blog. This is all based on the idea that gravitons form a dense, physical matrix in space that spinning bodies plow through as they orbit some central body. Kelland—www.vestheory.com
Friday, November 18, 2011
Spinning moons, planets and Sun
The Forces of Nature by Kelland Terry, Ph.D.
Dancing was still a big part of life when I was a child. Everyone in our small town would gather frequently to dance in a large hall that also served as a basketball court and an area to put on plays. Old folks, young folks, and those in between would dance with each other while those who couldn’t dance would sit and talk and watch the activities—there was no TV. Parent’s taught sons and daughters and older siblings taught younger siblings how to fox trot and waltz. Even our school teachers had a hand when it was raining and impossible to have recess outside. The fox trot and later swing was learned by almost everyone. Spinning across the dance floor with your partner was healthy for mind and body but is now a lost art form except for “Dancing With The Stars”.
Spinning is a curious attribute of all things both large and small, be it electrons, photons, or heavenly bodies, they all spin on their axes. The spin rates of the satellites in our solar system are strongly influenced by gravitational fields, the diameter of the satellite, and its momentum.
Just how the gravitational field affects the spin rate of the Earth and other satellites is complex. A dense field of gravitons serves as a positive factor to induce spin because satellites continually rub against this barrier at an angle, which causes the satellites to spin on its axes as discussed previously. On the other hand, gravity has a hand in holding our Moon in synchrony with Earth’s spin rate such that the same side of the Moon is always facing Earth. This is true for almost all moons in our solar system. This means that the force of gravity is also a negative factor reducing spin rate. In tomorrows blog I will discuss briefly how the diameter of the satellite influences spin rate. Perhaps you can already guess the outcome. Kelland—www.vestheory.com
Dancing was still a big part of life when I was a child. Everyone in our small town would gather frequently to dance in a large hall that also served as a basketball court and an area to put on plays. Old folks, young folks, and those in between would dance with each other while those who couldn’t dance would sit and talk and watch the activities—there was no TV. Parent’s taught sons and daughters and older siblings taught younger siblings how to fox trot and waltz. Even our school teachers had a hand when it was raining and impossible to have recess outside. The fox trot and later swing was learned by almost everyone. Spinning across the dance floor with your partner was healthy for mind and body but is now a lost art form except for “Dancing With The Stars”.
Spinning is a curious attribute of all things both large and small, be it electrons, photons, or heavenly bodies, they all spin on their axes. The spin rates of the satellites in our solar system are strongly influenced by gravitational fields, the diameter of the satellite, and its momentum.
Just how the gravitational field affects the spin rate of the Earth and other satellites is complex. A dense field of gravitons serves as a positive factor to induce spin because satellites continually rub against this barrier at an angle, which causes the satellites to spin on its axes as discussed previously. On the other hand, gravity has a hand in holding our Moon in synchrony with Earth’s spin rate such that the same side of the Moon is always facing Earth. This is true for almost all moons in our solar system. This means that the force of gravity is also a negative factor reducing spin rate. In tomorrows blog I will discuss briefly how the diameter of the satellite influences spin rate. Perhaps you can already guess the outcome. Kelland—www.vestheory.com
Thursday, November 17, 2011
Beer drinking has its benefits
The Forces of Nature by Kelland Terry, Ph.D.
Steve Rozelle, a close friend of mine that I played basketball with on the high school team (I was the last sub), surveyed and drank beer with left the university where he was on the basketball team to move to the city where I was attending college. He came there to meet up with my cousin Tanya that he later married. He often had little to do so he taught me chess in the afternoons and we played pool at night while his future wife worked; my grade point average that year reflected my activities. He would pour a pitcher of beer over my head and I would reciprocate. I gave up science to become a thespian for one year and he did the same. Steve did however rise to his potential. He was an engineer and became second in command in the construction of a nuclear reactor in the eastern USA: His quick mind and dominating personality far exceeded the average individual.
Where were we? We’ll get back to the parameters that influence the spin rate of satellites in the next blog. No more drinking beer and reminiscing, Kelland—www.vestheory.com
Steve Rozelle, a close friend of mine that I played basketball with on the high school team (I was the last sub), surveyed and drank beer with left the university where he was on the basketball team to move to the city where I was attending college. He came there to meet up with my cousin Tanya that he later married. He often had little to do so he taught me chess in the afternoons and we played pool at night while his future wife worked; my grade point average that year reflected my activities. He would pour a pitcher of beer over my head and I would reciprocate. I gave up science to become a thespian for one year and he did the same. Steve did however rise to his potential. He was an engineer and became second in command in the construction of a nuclear reactor in the eastern USA: His quick mind and dominating personality far exceeded the average individual.
Where were we? We’ll get back to the parameters that influence the spin rate of satellites in the next blog. No more drinking beer and reminiscing, Kelland—www.vestheory.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)