Venus spins slowly as predicted by elastic strings

The Forces of Nature by Kelland Terry, Ph.D.
Astrophysicists believe that some cataclysmic event caused Venus to be flipped on its axis because, unlike the other planets, it spins in the opposite direction that it rotates around the Sun.

Venus spins slower than any other planet in our solar system, just 1.81 meters per second. Its slow spin rate is as predicted by elastic string theory because it spins opposite to its rotation about the Sun. The planet is trying to roll inward towards the Sun as it spins on its axis; all of the other planets spin and roll in the opposite direction. The forces at work are attempting to reverse the spin direction of Venus. This is a slow process that will require millions if not billions of years for the planet to completely reverse spin direction and come to a new equilibrium. Kelland—www.vestheory.com

Predicting spin rate of satellites

The Forces of Nature by Kelland Terry, Ph.D.

Spinning bodies plowing through a dense field of gravitons suggests that gravity, satellite diameter, and satellite momentum can be used to predict spin rate. The question posed is this: Can these three independent variables predict the spin rates for the satellites in our solar system? This was analyzed using regression analysis for our Sun and all the moons and planets in our solar system. There were 26 heavenly bodies used in this analysis.

Now for the results: A regression analysis computes an r value, which is a measurement of goodness of fit for the satellites along a regression line. The closer the r value is to 1.0 the better the fit. In this study r was 0.99, which is pretty close to 1.0. This suggests that 99 percent of the spin rate for of all the spinning bodies in our solar system can be accounted for by their momentum, diameter, and the gravitational force between satellite and central body. For example, the Sun spins on its axis at 1946 meters/second and the predicted rate was also 1946 meters per second. Mars spin rate is 240.8 m/s and its predicted rate was 243 m/s. Saturn’s actual spin rate is 10279 m/s and the predicted value was 10061 m/s.

A little discussion might help. The theory is that the spin of a satellite moving through a dense fabric of elastic strings is influenced in much the same way as a billiard ball striking the side of a pool table. When the ball strikes the cushion, it will promote a spin inward towards the side of the table. In the case of Earth, striking the gravitons emanating from the Sun, it will tend to cause the planet to spin inward toward the Sun. Thus, it will induce the planet to spin in the same direction it orbits the Sun.

Now for the conclusion: The study is as predicted: Satellite spin is controlled by the density of the elastic strings and gravity, diameter of the satellite because this affects its interaction with the graviton matrix, and satellite momentum because a large fast body such as our Sun will be less affected by the graviton matrix it must plow through as it circles the center of the Milky Way Galaxy.

Why is this important? It provides striking evidence that elastic strings have a physical presence in space, which means gravitons must have mass. How else can you explain the results of this experiment? It also is of interest because it explains one of the conundrums of science—what controls the spin rate of satellites.

This study is supported by the following: I have shown that spinning table tennis balls in flight continue to curve even in a complete vacuum, which suggests they are spinning against a graviton matrix in their path. It means gravitons have a physical presence in space; they have mass. This concept is supported by my experiments that show spinning table tennis balls curve more in a magnetic field because, like gravitons, the elastic strings that make up the magnetic field have mass. Kelland—www.vestheory.com

The connection between spin and rotation

The Forces of Nature by Kelland Terry, Ph.D.

The spin of a planet, or any satellite, is tied to its rotation around a central body.

The concentration of gravitons emanating from our Sun far outnumbers the gravitons from our Milky Way Galaxy because of the close proximity of the Sun to the planets in our solar system. However, gravitons from all sources are vast: they form an interlaced graviton matrix that heavenly bodies must plow through as they orbit their respective central bodies. Let’s examine the Earth-Sun system.

As Earth rotates around the Sun in its elliptical orbit it is constantly striking the Sun’s gravitons at an angle. Because of the angles taken by Earth as it collides with the graviton barrier, it is causing Earth to spin on its axis in the same direction as its orbit. This means the leading edge of Earth is spinning inward towards the Sun. Spin is created much like a billiard ball that begins spinning after it strikes the cushion along the pool table. Here we find that the leading edge of the billiard ball is spinning inward towards the edge of the table.

The Earth, like most rotating bodies, is spinning in the same direction that it rotates around the Sun. This is exactly what you would expect if the leading edge of the planet is rubbing against the gravitons emanating from the Sun.

This helps explain why the strength of the gravitational field, diameter of the planet, and the satellite’s momentum are important factors that influence the spin of a satellite. Kelland—www.vestheory.com

Factors that influence spin rate of satellites

The Forces of Nature by Kelland Terry, Ph.D.

Because gravitons influence the spin of satellites in our solar system, it means the diameter of the satellite will influence spin rate because the larger the diameter the greater the surface of the satellite that comes in contact with the graviton matrix. In this case, it is having a positive effect on satellite spin.

However, like gravity, the diameter of the satellite can also have a negative impact on spin rate. The larger the diameter, the greater the leverage that Earth can apply to our Moon to control spin rate. It is much like the use of a long pole to maintain balance by someone walking along a tight wire. Earth’s gravity is pulling down on both sides of the moon, which tends to reduce spin rate.

Momentum also plays a part in the spin rate of a satellite. Momentum is a measurement of mass x velocity. We all know it takes a country mile to stop a train because of its great momentum. In the same manner, our massive Sun moving at great velocity will be affected less by the graviton matrix it plows through as it rotates around the center of the Milky Way Galaxy. Its huge momentum will tend to push aside the matrix, which means its spin will be influenced less by its rotation velocity. Thus, a large momentum is a negative factor influencing spin rate.

The extent that gravity, satellite diameter, and satellite momentum influence spin rate can be measured. This is discussed in my next blog. This is all based on the idea that gravitons form a dense, physical matrix in space that spinning bodies plow through as they orbit some central body. Kelland—www.vestheory.com

Factors that influence spin rate of satellites

The Forces of Nature by Kelland Terry, Ph.D.

The diameter of the satellite will influence spin rate because the larger the diameter the greater the surface of the satellite that comes in contact with the graviton matrix. In this case, it is having a positive effect on satellite spin.

However, like gravity, the diameter of the satellite can also have a negative impact on spin rate. The larger the diameter, the greater the leverage that Earth can apply to our Moon to control spin rate. It is much like the use of a long pole to maintain balance by someone walking along a tight wire. Earth’s gravity is pulling down on both sides of the moon, which tends to reduce spin rate.

Momentum also plays a part in the spin rate of a satellite. Momentum is a measurement of mass x velocity. We all know it takes a country mile to stop a train because of its great momentum. In the same manner, our massive Sun moving at great velocity will be affected less by the graviton matrix it plows through as it rotates around the center of the Milky Way Galaxy. Its huge momentum will tend to push aside the matrix, which means its spin will be influenced less by its rotation velocity. Thus, a large momentum is a negative factor influencing spin rate.

The extent that gravity, satellite diameter, and satellite momentum influence spin rate can be measured. This is discussed in my next blog. This is all based on the idea that gravitons form a dense, physical matrix in space that spinning bodies plow through as they orbit some central body. Kelland—www.vestheory.com

Spinning moons, planets and Sun

The Forces of Nature by Kelland Terry, Ph.D.
Dancing was still a big part of life when I was a child. Everyone in our small town would gather frequently to dance in a large hall that also served as a basketball court and an area to put on plays. Old folks, young folks, and those in between would dance with each other while those who couldn’t dance would sit and talk and watch the activities—there was no TV. Parent’s taught sons and daughters and older siblings taught younger siblings how to fox trot and waltz. Even our school teachers had a hand when it was raining and impossible to have recess outside. The fox trot and later swing was learned by almost everyone. Spinning across the dance floor with your partner was healthy for mind and body but is now a lost art form except for “Dancing With The Stars”.

Spinning is a curious attribute of all things both large and small, be it electrons, photons, or heavenly bodies, they all spin on their axes. The spin rates of the satellites in our solar system are strongly influenced by gravitational fields, the diameter of the satellite, and its momentum.

Just how the gravitational field affects the spin rate of the Earth and other satellites is complex. A dense field of gravitons serves as a positive factor to induce spin because satellites continually rub against this barrier at an angle, which causes the satellites to spin on its axes as discussed previously. On the other hand, gravity has a hand in holding our Moon in synchrony with Earth’s spin rate such that the same side of the Moon is always facing Earth. This is true for almost all moons in our solar system. This means that the force of gravity is also a negative factor reducing spin rate. In tomorrows blog I will discuss briefly how the diameter of the satellite influences spin rate. Perhaps you can already guess the outcome. Kelland—www.vestheory.com

Beer drinking has its benefits

The Forces of Nature by Kelland Terry, Ph.D.
Steve Rozelle, a close friend of mine that I played basketball with on the high school team (I was the last sub), surveyed and drank beer with left the university where he was on the basketball team to move to the city where I was attending college. He came there to meet up with my cousin Tanya that he later married. He often had little to do so he taught me chess in the afternoons and we played pool at night while his future wife worked; my grade point average that year reflected my activities. He would pour a pitcher of beer over my head and I would reciprocate. I gave up science to become a thespian for one year and he did the same. Steve did however rise to his potential. He was an engineer and became second in command in the construction of a nuclear reactor in the eastern USA: His quick mind and dominating personality far exceeded the average individual.

Where were we? We’ll get back to the parameters that influence the spin rate of satellites in the next blog. No more drinking beer and reminiscing, Kelland—www.vestheory.com

Spin rate of solar bodies

The Forces of Nature by Kelland Terry, Ph.D.

Astrophysicists believe our solar system was formed from a swirling mass of hydrogen, silicon, and other particles that coalesced to form the Sun, planets, and moons found in our solar system.

The energy of the swirling particles was conserved as orbiting, spinning bodies in our solar system. Scientists believe at one time the spin rate of the Sun was 1000 times greater than what it is today. The spin rate for the individual planets varies greatly from Mercury with a spin rate of just 3 meters per second to Jupiter that spins at 13,070 meters per second. Planet Earth spins just once in 24 hours, which means its surface speed is 248 meters per second. All of the moons trapped in orbit about their respective planets spin very slowly. What dictates the spin rate of these bodies? What causes the great differences in their spin rate? Why has the spin rate of the Sun slowed down? Elastic strings do have a story to tell. Kelland—www.vestheory.com

Our solar system bears witness

The Forces of Nature by Kelland Terry, Ph.D.
In 1610 an Italian named Galileo began using a spyglass that was invented a couple of years early by a German spectacle maker living in the Netherlands by the name of Hans Lippershey. The spyglass he invented magnified objects because it used a two lens system.

Using a spyglass he built, Galileo quickly discovered that the planet Jupiter had moons that rotated around it. He had confirmed what Copernicus had concluded some 60 years earlier—that smaller solar bodies rotate around larger central bodies, which meant that Earth rotated around the Sun. Of course, we all know this got Galileo into hot water with the all powerful Catholic Church, and he was nearly executed because the Bible says the opposite. Science and religion have come a long way in the past 400 years, but unfortunately, strong remnants of this thinking exist today.

Using a spyglass that came to me as a gift from my wife, I had the pleasure one starry night in Rockville to see the moons of Jupiter and watch over a period of several nights as they appeared first on the left side then the right side of the planet. I realized I was viewing with my own eyes exactly what Galileo had witnessed 400 years earlier. I suddenly felt connected to this ancient scientist.

Not only do all heavenly bodies rotate around other heavenly bodies they also spin on their axes. Earth rotates around the Sun once per year, and it spins on its axis once every 24 hours, which means as I sit here at the computer, I am actually traveling eastward at approximately 1000 miles per hour because Earth is spinning on its axis in that direction.

The curious thing is this: All heavenly bodies have their own unique spin rate. What causes the planets, the moons and our Sun to spin at different rates, and some at rates far different than expected? What can elastic string theory tell us about the spin rate of the stellar bodies in our solar system? Kelland—www.vestheory.com

Graviton waves trapped

A large flood in the Virgin River was a time of great excitement for the kids in Rockville. We would gather on the Green Bridge that crossed the river and watch logs and whole trees being swept downstream. The river became so muddy that fish lined up along the river’s banks and stuck their mouths and gills out of water to breath. I always marveled at this adaptation. Those that didn’t run for cover were likely swept down stream to Lake Mead and the Colorado River. The Virgin River carries more mud for its size than any other river in the USA.

Waves of water and the waves that travel along an elastic string may have the same general appearance, but the similarity ends there. Water waves are composed of many parts, and for this reason, it is impossible to grasp these waves as they rush downstream. In contrast, the waves that travel along a virtual elastic string are part of the string, and they have interconnected physical properties.

Consider an electron going through its string cycle with its magnons, electons, and gravitons retracting against the electron’s surface. Because of the retraction process, the electron becomes extremely dense, perhaps more dense than any other material on Earth. Now imagine a graviton trapped between this dense electron and its retracting strings. This graviton can not retract back to its source. The resistance created allows the graviton to exert a force of attraction.

This state does not last long because the graviton is released as the electron completes its string cycle. The retracting graviton quickly loses its ability to transmit waves, perhaps because it becomes more diffuse throughout its length. And without waves, there will be no further resistance to retraction.

This model explains why there are multiple points of attachment between a graviton and the body it penetrates. It explains why the distance through a body and the density of the body predetermines the resistance created when a graviton retracts. It explains why the length of the graviton outside the body it penetrates has no effect on the force of attraction created. Thus, the attraction force of a single graviton from Earth is the same whether the graviton penetrates a body close at hand or whether this same body is light years away.

Snapping portals cause waves

The Forces of Nature by Kelland Terry, Ph.D.
Waves in the Virgin River at flood stage and the shape of waves in the ocean resemble the waves that travel along a common string. There is a broad front to the wave which slopes to the rear to meet the normal level of the ocean.

Try attaching a string to a fixed object and tap it with your finger. You will be amazed at the velocity of the small wave that travels away from your finger. Physicists credit the elastic property of a common string for the waves that travel along its surface when disturbed. Physicists have shown that the smaller the string the faster the wave velocity, and of course virtual elastic strings are extremely small and they have perfect elasticity. This accounts for the fact these waves travel at immense velocity. The equations provided by physicists support this idea.

During the string cycle, there are billions of virtual particles ejected through portals. The strings created remain connected to the goo inside the electron, and the string created is extremely small compared to the virtual particle that created the string. This allows many strings to accumulate inside a portal during the string cycle without affecting the portal size. If there are 100 strings that accumulate inside each portal during one string cycle, it means the portal opened and closed 100 times during this period of time.

The opening and closing of portals causes a physical disturbance that travels along the string in the form of a tiny wave. Because the string has perfect elasticity and extremely small size, the wave will travel at immense velocity along the string without loss in energy. The velocity of the traveling wave will have nearly the same velocity as the particle as it is ejected into space.
Kelland—www.vestheory.com

No two gravitons are identical

The Forces of Nature by Kelland Terry, Ph.D.
The Virgin River has two major tributaries. One fork flows through Zion National Park from the mountains north of Zion. At flood stage it tends to be a muddy white color. The other fork joins this stream a few miles south of Zion and a few miles north of Rockville. It flows from mountains south of Zion. At flood stage the river in this fork tends to be a muddy red color. During some floods, the water that rages through Rockville is muddy red on the south side of the river and muddy white on the north side of the river. As the flood continues the portion of red to white changes as the storm shifts its position. Let’s see how this might relate to gravitons.

My model for the electron string cycle has the graviton being ejected into space from a point near the center of the two spheres that make up the electron. This means the virtual particle that is to become a graviton may be composed of s-goo and n-goo to varying degrees. When the virtual particle is ejected into space, the graviton string that develops is composed of both materials. I also believe that the composition of this material is not uniform along the length of the string, much like the Virgin River at flood stage. This means every graviton is different from every other graviton. Because all gravitons have the same mass, but varying composition they do not bond and cause a force of repulsion, nor do they bond and cause a force of attraction. Kelland—www.vestheory.com
Kelland—www.vestheory.com

Specificity of elastic strings

The Forces of Nature by Kelland Terry, Ph.D.
At one point in time I did not believe the poem offered below that I had written many years ago had any great relevancy to existing conditions. Obviously, this is not the case at the present time. Just substitute race bigotry or fanatical religion or the desire to breed for “crown”.

Somewhere on earth a mother weeps
As her child lies dying.
And somewhere on earth lovers love
Even as they're bleeding.

Is it the fate of Man
To make war for the crown?
Is it written in his genes,
Is he self destruction bound?

Has Evolution played him an evil trick
By giving the animal a super intellect?
An explosive mixture of mind and behavior
That propels him onward to his own extinction?

Will a drive more ancient than Man
Cause him forever to war upon the land?
Or can the animal gain master of his will,
That is the cruel riddle only the future can tell!

The end…..


The specificity of an elastic string is determined by two attributes: the size of the string and its composition. The composition of the string is determined by the fact it is either s-goo or n-goo, and the size of the string determines whether it is a magnon or electon.

Gravitons neither bond and cause a force of attraction nor do they bond and cause a force of repulsion. How is this possible? I will address this important question in my next blog.

Kelland—www.vestheory.com

Self inducing forces

The Forces of Nature by Kelland Terry, Ph.D.

The forces of nature are self inducing; in terms of the electron’s string cycle it means the creation of strings and retraction of strings is self inducing. I believe there are three factors at work. First, the strings have perfect elasticity. This means when a virtual particle is ejected into space it stores potential energy in the string in the same manner that a rubber band stores potential energy when it is stretched. This means no additional outside source of energy is needed for this string to retract back to source.

Second, the energy of the retracting strings is not lost. It becomes stored as potential energy in the form of condensed goo that has perfect elasticity. The goo becomes an extremely dense material as the strings bond and exert pressure on the surface of the electron. At some point in time, the internal potential energy reaches a critical state and the dense goo begins ejecting new virtual particles.

Third, a spinning electron has spin angular momentum. Scientists theorize that spin angular momentum drives the self inducing magnetic forces. My model for the electron’s string cycle has the graviton winding up on the electron in the same manner that a fishing line winds up on a reel, which of course utilizes the spin angular momentum of the electron. It causes the electron to be divided into two spheres. Of course it should be appreciated that all strings eventually retract back inside the electron to help form the primordial goo for another round of strings. A spinning electron would aid in the distribution of strings about the surface of the electron, which in turn would aid the self induction process. Finally, spin angular momentum might aid in the formation of the virtual particle inside the electron in some unknown manner. I will come back to this point when I discuss radio wave particles in a future blog. Kelland--vestheory.com

Ejection of virtual particles through portals

The Forces of Nature by Kelland Terry, Ph.D.
When the electron reaches its most condensed stage, the internal pressure reaches a critical state, which causes it to eject virtual particles into space. The virtual particles are ejected through portals, and the size of the portal helps to determine the size of the virtual particle. I envision there are billions of portals for e-electons and every portal creates one string with each round. In the same manner, there are separate distinct portals for p-electons, n-magnons, s-magnons, and gravitons.

At the completion of a round, the strings that blanket the electron once more apply pressure to the surface of the electron as they continue to retract back through their portals. This eventually forces another round of strings to be ejected into space. This means that during any one string cycle every portal fires numerous times; perhaps in the neighborhood of 100 times each.

A point in time is reached when retracting strings are no longer applying pressure on the outside of the electron, and the number of strings emitted by an electron has reached maximum. At this point, the newly created elastic strings have bonded to each other and begin a new string cycle. This works because the electron and the strings have perfect elasticity. Kelland—www.vestheory.com

Electron reaches most condensed state

11/1/11
The Forces of Nature by Kelland Terry, Ph.D.
At its most condensed state, the electron is completely covered by retracting electons and magnons bound to their complimentary strings. The strings are literally attempting to pull the strings they are bonded to back through their own portals. This applies great inward pressure to the outside of the electron. At the same time, the retracting gravitons are squeezing the center of the electron into two spheres. It is envisioned that electons and magnons contribute equally to the inward pressure exerted on the electron. During this process, the strings that have retracted inside the electron change their structure to create the primordial s-goo and n-goo needed for a new round of strings. Finally a critical stage is reached and the electron begins ejecting virtual particles.

The metamorphosis of the strings to primordial goo reminds me of the metamorphosis of limestone to marble and marble to magma as the pressure on the rock increases due to silt deposited above over the centuries by rivers that feed the oceans. In this case we are dealing with a rock cycle. Finally, the magma is thrust up from below to create new rock whose composition depends on the composition of the magma, which is determined by its location on Earth. Kelland—www.vestheory.com